Well, sure, if your base comparison is with 864p and 720p versions (which also run at 60fps), I guess the Pro version its not a complete disasterLooks fine on Pro, bro (sm1)
1080p, 60 FPS, higher effects and better texture filtering than other console versions. Also, kinda unfair of DF to compare load times with an SSD equipped PC
Probably wanted to stick to the "$399 machine" target
Actually SSDs aren't that expensive anymore and a 400$ PC can absolutely have SSD in it albeit small (128/256 GB).Most PC builds aren't going to exceed 1080p, I doubt anyone on PG is playing this on 4K
Also, you can't seriously tell me a $399 PC will have an SSD in it
True, but then I also bought a $95 250GB external SSD for my Pro, so there's that too
which basically goes over 400$ + you can't install as much ps4 games on that ssd as you can on PCTrue, but then I also bought a $95 250GB external SSD for my Pro, so there's that too
middle east will give u better pings .. when they mean asia they never mean south asia though.
Fuck no. I think we had this debate some time ago where equivalent PC with 500GB hdd can store far more games than the PS4 500GB can. The OS on PS4 is more hungry for plattersAlso, a 250GB SSD will install the same amount of content, plugging it into a PC doesn't magically unlock extra platters
Thats where you are wrong. 1440p monitors do exist and since PC version has a built in resolution scale option most people can downsample for superior image quality even on 1080p displays. Its not a very demanding title just because the consoles cant handle itMost PC builds aren't going to exceed 1080p, I doubt anyone on PG is playing this on 4K
It can. But I was talking about the consoles where you pride yourself on having a $400 machine and putting in an SSD defeats the purpose. In some tests even base PS4 was loading faster than the Pro lolAlso, you can't seriously tell me a $399 PC will have an SSD in it
i m running that resolution scaler of 200% as posted in the images beforeThats where you are wrong. 1440p monitors do exist and since PC version has a built in resolution scale option most people can downsample for superior image quality even on 1080p displays. Its not a very demanding title just because the consoles cant handle it
PS4's don't have Black Box releases yetFuck no. I think we had this debate some time ago where equivalent PC with 500GB hdd can store far more games than the PS4 500GB can. The OS on PS4 is more hungry for platters
so that's something that can't be helped.I know monitors of various resolutions exist, I'm saying that even then 95% people will play it on 1080pThats where you are wrong. 1440p monitors do exist and since PC version has a built in resolution scale option most people can downsample for superior image quality even on 1080p displays. Its not a very demanding title just because the consoles cant handle it
the console version is a port of the 2 year old arcade board which was running on PC hardware. They didn't develop this game for consoles in the first place a $399 console with a $100 SSD is still a much more cost effective machine
also, yes I saw that DF video with the OG PS4 showing 3 seconds quicker, again, that's based on stock drives and online connectivity etc all play a major factor. I'll see if I can get a copy of the game and see if I can do SSD load times.
Those releases mostly reduce the download size, not uncompressed installed sizePS4's don't have Black Box releases yet
The biggest culprit on PS4 is the ridiculously large updates. Whatever makes you feel better about the Pro versionI know monitors of various resolutions exist, I'm saying that even then 95% people will play it on 1080p
Biggest tragedy the loyal PS fanbase has to come to terms withAlso, not to blow anyone's minds of not but Tekken 7 isn't exactly the most well optimized game
Not going to post another detailed build again, but I already posted a 400$ build some time ago that can match/outperform the Pro. Another $100 makes it that much easier, and adding another $60 for online play and we are way past the mark where it was supposed to be cost effectivea $399 console with a $100 SSD is still a much more cost effective machine
Let me point out another key factor then which is obvious from the DF comparisons even: ambient occlusion, which is exactly the same as on Pro as base PS4 and gives it a flat look.. If this was the upgrade on the Pro you'd be calling the difference "maasssivee"
faraany3k:
Necrokiller:
www.pcgamer.com
EternalBlizzard:
faraany3k:
why you are paying american rates in Pakistan. Search cheaper region like Turkey. 13k for 13 months. Ms does not careShadowdragoo said:
faraany3k:
Necrokiller:
There are no such thing as "bad design" bro, its all "artistic vision" nowEternalBlizzard said:Is it just me or people lately seem to defend every bad game design decision made by the devs and try to give bullshit reasons for that? Or perhaps it's because I'm on reddit and discord
EternalBlizzard:
faraany3k:
