I didn't mean surviving like that, I just meant that a lot of people get into fast but then a lot of them flunk a few courses right in the first semester.
You need to have 50 percent in your intermediate or equivalence.
I didn't mean surviving like that, I just meant that a lot of people get into fast but then a lot of them flunk a few courses right in the first semester.
You need to have 50 percent in your intermediate or equivalence.
Right. There isn't a particular value for that. Its set according to the overall performance of the people applying that year. I guess you will get in for sure if you score more than 50 percent on the admission test.
Just get about 60 in the test and you're good to go. Getting into FAST is easy. 60 is a safe limit. Chances in the 50-59 ranges are good as well but 60 is a good number and easy to get.
Just get about 60 in the test and you're good to go. Getting into FAST is easy. 60 is a safe limit. Chances in the 50-59 ranges are good as well but 60 is a good number and easy to get.
Right. There isn't a particular value for that. Its set according to the overall performance of the people applying that year. I guess you will get in for sure if you score more than 50 percent on the admission test.
Just get about 60 in the test and you're good to go. Getting into FAST is easy. 60 is a safe limit. Chances in the 50-59 ranges are good as well but 60 is a good number and easy to get.
Yeah. BTW I mean 60 after all the negative marking. The number is this low because everybody takes about a 4-5 mark hit from negative marking. But yeah, FAST is easy to get in, but still don't underestimate. Paper is a bit easy, but it's the time you have to worry about. The time pressurizes you. And once the time is up for a subject, you can NOT go back.
Yeah. BTW I mean 60 after all the negative marking. The number is this low because everybody takes about a 4-5 mark hit from negative marking. But yeah, FAST is easy to get in, but still don't underestimate. Paper is a bit easy, but it's the time you have to worry about. The time pressurizes you. And once the time is up for a subject, you can NOT go back.
You don't really need academies/coaching for FAST. Also, the questions aren't that long either. They won't ask you to solve whole questions, just basic stuff.
You don't really need academies/coaching for FAST. Also, the questions aren't that long either. They won't ask you to solve whole questions, just basic stuff.
lol, the aptitude thing was weird. The reason for the 'number' being 60 is because of the aptitude probably. You can't really tell the right answer, they were just weird shapes as much as I remember. Bunch of boxes and squiggly lines and a riddle or two.
I didn't (or probably couldn't) prepare for this secion, that's why it's called an 'aptitude'
lol, the aptitude thing was weird. The reason for the 'number' being 60 is because of the aptitude probably. You can't really tell the right answer, they were just weird shapes as much as I remember. Bunch of boxes and squiggly lines
I didn't (or probably couldn't) prepare for this secion, that's why it's called an 'aptitude'
Basic maths isn't that bad. It's really 'basic'. The problem with it (at least in my case) was that it was the first subject on the test and I was still a bit confused about their timing rules and stuff, and the timer suddenly started why I was trying to think. So yeah, I got a bit confused. But the questions were definitely easy.
no idea how that is a steal by wasting 3500 rupees per month and for games that are removed before you can finish them off.xbox gamepass is garbage with no local prices
no idea how that is a steal by wasting 3500 rupees per month and for games that are removed before you can finish them off.xbox gamepass is garbage with no local prices
Just finished Diablo 4 season in hurry to play Fallout 4 but gamepass released another banger in the form of Star Wars on April 25th. Gamepass is a steal man.
Is it just me or people lately seem to defend every bad game design decision made by the devs and try to give bullshit reasons for that? Or perhaps it's because I'm on reddit and discord
Is it just me or people lately seem to defend every bad game design decision made by the devs and try to give bullshit reasons for that? Or perhaps it's because I'm on reddit and discord