Moral policing is truly on another level here. What else can be expected from Sony poniesThis is the thought process and level of intelligence we can expect from those suddenly in a criticizing mode
Such smart individuals
Moral policing is truly on another level here. What else can be expected from Sony poniesThis is the thought process and level of intelligence we can expect from those suddenly in a criticizing mode
Such smart individuals
Nothing personal, it's just referring to the inconsistency of people criticizing TLoU here. It's ironic how people blatantly flashing their fanboyism are accusing others of it.Moral policing is truly on another level here. What else can be expected from Sony ponies
You will see people attack others by calling them fanboys as if ND and Sony dont have any fanboys. As if they are the only ones looking at ND games with a rational thought process.Nothing personal, it's just referring to the inconsistency of people criticizing TLoU here. It's ironic how people blatantly flashing their fanboyism are accusing others of it.
But thats what happening there too. You see criticism for Cyberpunk and their previous games there but praising TLoU 1 and 2 here. The fact that you are okay with one thing and not the other does say something too, no?We have Cyberpunk and TLoU II trailer at E3, both of them universally liked by critics and fans (and TLoU II showed gameplay as well). Yet in the first case, someone is constantly posting positive reactions to the game from various sources while criticising TLoU II and ND for literally NO reason based on personal dislike as if Cyberpunk can only be good if TLoU is bad.
This reads like ramblings of an old angry man journey i.eI can easily predict that TLOU 2 won't be as highly regarded as the first one. I like their UC franchise but even a blind man can see their critical success had contantly fallen since UC2.
U can't keep getting away by recycling the same ideas again and again. Technology can take u so far.
then I might be blind."but even a blind man can see their critical success had contantly fallen since UC2."
. If they were relying on just technology, they wouldnt have been so positively received.U can't keep getting away by recycling the same ideas again and again. Technology can take u so far.
I dont think ND is at all polarizing. There are a very small minority of haters, who bash its game, like any other studio. If it was so polarizing I think that would be reflected in the scores its games get, nor alot of people putting in their top 5 list..i.e I loathe Halo, but many people adore it and I respect that.
IMO if a studio is constantly putting up successful numbers critically and commercially, like ND - its pretty much top notch
This ...a logical mind among stSuddenly some people have newfound criticism for TLoU after they were offended by TLoU II trailer.
TLoU is a universally acclaimed masterpiece whether you like it or not, just like The Witcher 3 is or some other games are. Talking about it like it's some 6 or 7-rated-game is fine as your subjective opinion but it doesn't represent the critic and user consensus and it shouldn't be presented as something objective. It's a given that masterpieces have their flaws and one can make a long list of them with respect to The Witcher 3 gameplay, for instance, but it doesn't change the status of the game as a masterpiece among critics and fans alike.
Such smart individuals
That's not true of course. No one said being a fanboy is a problem or that criticism is a problem. Accusations (about harassment) are being thrown here to somehow denigrate ND and TLoU II. TLoU is receiving the same treatment, all surprisingly after the new trailer that offended some people. Those who didn't like TLoU now dislike it more it seems because they didn't like something in the trailer? This is not the criticism of the game; that's just using shallow means to attack a game when you don't have solid criticism. And remember all this is being presented as something objective about the game. I'm a Witcher and TLoU fan and I don't care if someone tells me they abhor these games. That's their personal taste and it's okay. But giving the impression that TLoU II is just another random game that ND is using to redeem itself for God knows what crimes they have committed sounds like misplaced fanboyish envy.You will see people attack others by calling them fanboys as if ND and Sony dont have any fanboys. As if they are the only ones looking at ND games with a rational thought process.
But thats what happening there too. You see criticism for Cyberpunk and their previous games there but praising TLoU 1 and 2 here. The fact that you are okay with one thing and not the other does say something too, no?
NOOO...Joel needs to be a playable character..I think he was also mentioned in the trailer as "your old man..blah blah"Exactly, I completely agree. The gameplay was so good in the first that I wouldn't mind if it stayed the same for the second part.
Naughty Dog: Ellie is the Only Playable Character in The Last of Us Part II - Playstation 4
They said this about the first part too (Joel being the only playable character) but I will miss Joel.
This was an actual case that happened at ND.That's not true of course. No one said being a fanboy is a problem or that criticism is a problem. Accusations (about harassment) are being thrown here to somehow denigrate ND and TLoU II.
Actually some people arenÂ’t impressed by the details coming from the demo either. General reception of the developer and their games is precisely why practically every press impression coming out is exceptional from the people who have actually seen the demo. Nothing wrong if you wana hold out to see the demo yourself, but how much do you wana bet the criticism wonÂ’t end there?As for Cyberpunk, the criticism is based on how the game looks (references to GTA etc.) and it is based on the trailer to not see the gameplay at E3). Some people are holding their horses simply because they haven't seen the gameplay and the game does not have a history of its own, unlike TLoU II, to dispell all speculation. Would it make sense to say that CDPR is trying to redeem itself for making substandard games in the past simply because someone didn't like The Witcher 3? That's confusing personal taste with the general reception of the developer and their games.
My thoughts exactly! What was the purpose of wasting precious secs on that logically useless detail? It's almost like ND really need people to talk abt this game even if how stupid/ awkward that particular scene was.This was an actual case that happened at ND.
Im not offended by anything in that trailer really. But to act like its a normal occurrence is just blinding yourself of the point here. Nathan and elena relationship was a central theme in UC4 story. Iirc, the in game kiss wasnt showed on stage infront of the biggest audience. But even if it was, would it really have the same impact on the audience as it does here? Obviously not. Even the first remark coming from Chandoo on the trailer was about that kiss. Why? What was so out of the ordinary about it esp since we already know EllieÂ’s sexual orientation from The Left Behind DLC? ND wants people to talk to about it. And for some reason fanboys here wana shrug it off because anyone who talks about it is obviously homophobic.
Lol, bass kar do bhaiBut thats what happening there too. You see criticism for Cyberpunk and their previous games there but praising TLoU 1 and 2 here. The fact that you are okay with one thing and not the other does say something too, no?
Lesboooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos
Let me guess, these "Some people" include yourself, Janarioo, Journey's end and any other random poster who agrees with youActually some people arenÂ’t impressed by the details coming from the demo either. General reception of the developer and their games is precisely why practically every press impression coming out is exceptional from the people who have actually seen the demo. Nothing wrong if you wana hold out to see the demo yourself, but how much do you wana bet the criticism wonÂ’t end there?
So someone cannot level criticism at TLoU 2 based on their personal dislikes regarding TLoU 1? This does not make any sense to me.
oh bhae theek se parh to le baat kya ho rahiLet me guess, these "Some people" include yourself, Janarioo, Journey's end and any other random poster who agrees with you
Bhai trailer to fantastic hai baqaul aapke, ab yahan ghaas daalne ki himmat nahi to wo aur baat haiCyberpunk ki thread mai koi ghaas nahi daal raha it doesn't mean ye thread kharaab karni hai aa ke
Bhai ghussa aur frustration kaun kahaa nikaal raha hai wo to obvious haioh bhae theek se parh to le baat kya ho rahi
Bhai trailer to fantastic hai baqaul aapke, ab yahan ghaas daalne ki himmat nahi to wo aur baat hai
Bhai ap comment jo bhi karna hai karlo, topic history sab k liye open hai (unless ap cleverly jaa ke apni posts edit kardo ) kaun frustrated hai aur kaun upset hai sab ko dikh raa haiWaqaii obvious hai...trailer dekh ke apni tharak bahar aye to sahi hai. Koi “lesbo” kahe to fanboys trigger ho jaate hain. behtareen :tv:
Chalo bhae, fap in peace now lol
Not from the Cyberpunk thread, but here's a contenderFind a single post in the Cyberpunk thread which is this caliber
Not from the Cyberpunk thread, but here's a contender
That case is irrelevant to the game, so the point stands. It was needlessly brought up to attack the game.This was an actual case that happened at ND.
Im not offended by anything in that trailer really. But to act like its a normal occurrence is just blinding yourself of the point here. Nathan and elena relationship was a central theme in UC4 story. Iirc, the in game kiss wasnt showed on stage infront of the biggest audience. But even if it was, would it really have the same impact on the audience as it does here? Obviously not. Even the first remark coming from Chandoo on the trailer was about that kiss. Why? What was so out of the ordinary about it esp since we already know EllieÂ’s sexual orientation from The Left Behind DLC? ND wants people to talk to about it. And for some reason fanboys here wana shrug it off because anyone who talks about it is obviously homophobic.
Actually some people arenÂ’t impressed by the details coming from the demo either. General reception of the developer and their games is precisely why practically every press impression coming out is exceptional from the people who have actually seen the demo. Nothing wrong if you wana hold out to see the demo yourself, but how much do you wana bet the criticism wonÂ’t end there?
So someone cannot level criticism at TLoU 2 based on their personal dislikes regarding TLoU 1? This does not make any sense to me.
Taking savagery to a whole new levelNot from the Cyberpunk thread, but here's a contender
why you are paying american rates in Pakistan. Search cheaper region like Turkey. 13k for 13 months. Ms does not careShadowdragoo said:no idea how that is a steal by wasting 3500 rupees per month and for games that are removed before you can finish them off.xbox gamepass is garbage with no local prices
There are no such thing as "bad design" bro, its all "artistic vision" nowEternalBlizzard said:Is it just me or people lately seem to defend every bad game design decision made by the devs and try to give bullshit reasons for that? Or perhaps it's because I'm on reddit and discord