Yeah but I'd like to hear it from other people too, who're expert on computers, builds and prices. And also passionate about it. I'm sorry Chandoo, I won't heed your advice when it comes to computers. Nothing personal.
Well if you want an afforable device just for gaming and not to miss out on Sony's first part stuff .. the answer is clear
"I'd rather play"
Once you buy that 120HZ IPS DISPLAY with QHD DISPLAY WITH G-SYNC at 32 INCHS, you're really getting rid of the "PC isn't just for gaming" argument. Why else would you need a display with that kind of resolution? To view Facebook videos in HD? If you're talking about what PC has over consoles in terms of gaming, then keep the argument focused on gaming, not on stuff you can use any PC for. Whether you like PlayStation or not, the PS4 Pro comes very close to an amazing resolution at almost half the price too.
A Prototype clone? You say that like Prototype has performed better than inFamous, which it really hasn't. inFamous 1 is better than Prototype 1, inFamous 2 is MILES ahead of Prototype 2 and while inFamous is popular enough to get a completely new game on PS4, all Prototype managed to get on new consoles is a terrible remaster (can I even call it that?). Sure, you like Prototype better than inFamous, fine, but try not to sound so obnoxious when you're telling us that.
Point is, even if you enjoy them from time to time, anyone with a PC can get majority of those titles for free anyways. They're not demanding to run even.Don't be so dismissive
First party devs wouldn't have developed on PC to have a better clue either. A respectable multiplatform developer is who you should quote. ARK isn't one of them remotely.I could post comments from first party developers but I doubt those will be met with any better remarks
Plus the $60 YEARLY subscription for online play.
Yes, of course. But we are comparing just the gaming capabilities. I don't have a desktop PC at home (anymore). Cellphones/Android TV/Tablets for the general use and my office laptop for dev needs. But for argument's sake, we are comparing just the gaming aspects of it.
Of course not, but that's a debate for console's exclusives, not affordability.Y'all need to make a separate topic for this PC discussion
None taken
I get all my computer needs taken care of by my handy i5 laptop. But if you wanna play games like Horizon, Persona 5 etc there's no PC build that will let you play it
Well, some people value games to a level where skipping on exclusives is not an option. A decent display can emulate the 60FPS feel (I know real 60FPS and smooth motion are not comparable, but that's the best solution if you want that feel on consoles). Regarding FFXV, having played both versions on the kiosks, I prefer the sharpness the PS4 version offers. Smooth motion hides the frame pacing (which is again, occasional) but nothing can hide the immense blurriness of 360 version. Given the landscape of FFXV's world, it's all about distant vistas and beautiful horizons. And yes, I want this game to come out on the PC (which might happen).
True about the $60 annual charges, but that's less than the cost of electricity I'd pay to run a rig (at least here lol). Holds for PS4 also so I give you that.
Holy crap that melts my face. Can't imagine this baby in HDR.Hey, if it floats your boat, get an expensive gaming PC, lord knows I would too if I wasn't already satisfied with the Pro.
Not to forget, you're not gonna be playing this or many other things in UHD on a PC anyway
Never thought I'd see the day when Chandoo applauds GG.The good thing about the trailer is that you can tell it's in-engine by the minor popin in the distance shots
This should be a great tech showcase for Death Stranding too, same engine and all.
People are fine keeping two machines for gaming Chandoo, and your Pro isn't gonna run all "Horizon" gamesHey, if it floats your boat, get an expensive gaming PC, lord knows I would too if I wasn't already satisfied with the Pro.
Not to forget, you're not gonna be playing this or many other things in UHD on a PC anyway
Oh, I'm applauding just the game. I've had the misfortune of playing through KZ Shadow Fall, I've left my impressions earlier in this topic
was definitely not 'impressed' with that game. Only the one's that matterPeople are fine keeping two machines for gaming Chandoo, and your Pro isn't gonna run all "Horizon" games
Iirc one of the cinematic directors at CDPR had a temporary contract with GG to work on Horizon.
Given your praise for the past games in the franchise, its a shame your Pro can't run the one which universally matters the most nowOnly the one's that matter
The guy honed his skills at Bethesda, which makes sense
FH 1 is still the best Horizon as far as the reception goes, but that's old news, this is the new Horizon hotnessGiven your praise for the past games in the franchise, its a shame your Pro can't run the one which universally matters the most now
.
World design =/= cinematic directionThe guy honed his skills at Bethesda, which makes sense
Ex-Bethesda and CD Projekt Red developers helped build Horizon's open world | GamesRadar+
Necrokiller:
Chandoo:
Necrokiller:
You reap what you sow. This is what happens when you take away choice from consumers. Even with 88% split going to developers, they can't recoup costs. Meanwhile, Helldivers 2 is a massive hit for Sony thanks in big part to Steam.iampasha said:
iampasha:
faraany3k:
Necrokiller:
Necrokiller:
www.pcgamer.com
EternalBlizzard:
