The Official ‘O Levels’ Thread

Re: The Official ‘O Levels’ Thread.

AbbY said:

What am I hearing, people.

A couple of status updates on pages associated.




What the actual Abuses will lead to ban?!

Click to expand...

Where did you hear this shit?

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2

The Official ‘O Levels’ Thread.

I checked BC's website and their was no such thing. I don't think it's possible.

Plus, it was just a simple typo. I don't think that deserves a new exam. :/


Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

The Official ‘O Levels’ Thread.

AbbY said:

Quite possible that some kids were fucking around.

What was the error, though? Seldom do I see CIE not using spell-check.

Click to expand...

The question was:
"Why did Congress oppose the Morley Minto Reforms of 1906?"

It should have been 1909 instead.

People didn't even research but felt it was their duty to propagate the false news. -___-


Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

Re: The Official ‘O Levels’ Thread.

AsadAbrar said:

The question was:
"Why did Congress oppose the Morley Minto Reforms of 1906?"

It should have been 1909 instead.

People didn't even research but felt it was their duty to propagate the false news. -___-


Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

Click to expand...

I didnt even notice it. When I was reading through the question, I just quickly went through all three parts and I thought that 1906 date has been written for Simla Deputation which was the (a) part of the same question. I wrote 1909 for Morley Minto Reforms in my answer.

Sent from my codec using Nanomachines

mohammadyahya said:

I didnt even notice it. When I was reading through the question, I just quickly went through all three parts and I thought that 1906 date has been written for Simla Deputation which was the (a) part of the same question. I wrote 1909 for Morley Minto Reforms in my answer.

Sent from my codec using Nanomachines

Click to expand...

Same here. I didn't pay much attention because I said it's only a typo so I wrote about the Morley Minto Reforms in 1909.

BTW guys don't worry about important bits in the questions being misprinted. CIE goes easy on the question which is f***ed up. I heard about a mistake in AS' Maths exam (when we were in A2). And the teacher told us that they go easy on the checking if misprinting or something else happens.

Shary Bhallu TC said:

BTW guys don't worry about important bits in the questions being misprinted. CIE goes easy on the question which is f***ed up. I heard about a mistake in AS' Maths exam (when we were in A2). And the teacher told us that they go easy on the checking if misprinting or something else happens.

Click to expand...

You haz given me a new lifeeee.

Re: The Official ‘O Levels’ Thread.

Shary Bhallu TC said:

BTW guys don't worry about important bits in the questions being misprinted. CIE goes easy on the question which is f***ed up. I heard about a mistake in AS' Maths exam (when we were in A2). And the teacher told us that they go easy on the checking if misprinting or something else happens.

Click to expand...

That would be awesome! My paper already went very well, now that this has happened, there's no doubt of getting less than A InshaAllah.

Sent from my codec using Nanomachines

My freind didn't have a part of a question in the physics exam. His graph was replaced with a blank page. Lulz

AbbY said:

Hard to believe.

Besides, if it were a blank page, it'd SAY BLANK PAGE. Stupid of your friend to not ask the invigilator if the page had zero writing.

Click to expand...

It did say blank page. ^_^

i am thinking about repeating pak studies...in my first attempt i rattafied the first 2 sections and that messed it up....how do i prepare...you can assume i am preparing from scratch it has been 1.5 years since my first attempt

Re: The Official ‘O Levels’ Thread.

margallar said:

i am thinking about repeating pak studies...in my first attempt i rattafied the first 2 sections and that messed it up....how do i prepare...you can assume i am preparing from scratch it has been 1.5 years since my first attempt

Click to expand...

Rote study can NEVER get you good grades in O level. Just get the information and knowledge about all sections from various sources. I never relied on Section 1 and 2 only technique. I just think, Section 3 is much easier than section 2. Ayub Khan, Bhutto, Zia ul Haq, Benazir, Nawaz, these are much easier to remember, atleast for me.

Sent from my codec using Nanomachines

i learnt that the hard way....so tell me, how do i prepare now?

Re: The Official ‘O Levels’ Thread.

margallar said:

i learnt that the hard way....so tell me, how do i prepare now?

Click to expand...

As I said, just get the knowledge of the topics, from various sources, from books, from notes, from the internet, etc.

Sent from my codec using Nanomachines

mohammadyahya said:

Rote study can NEVER get you good grades in O level. Just get the information and knowledge about all sections from various sources. I never relied on Section 1 and 2 only technique. I just think, Section 3 is much easier than section 2. Ayub Khan, Bhutto, Zia ul Haq, Benazir, Nawaz, these are much easier to remember, atleast for me.

Sent from my codec using Nanomachines

Click to expand...

BTW, this Section 1 + Section 2 technique will only work till November 2013. The pattern will get changed in May/June 2014. [MENTION=26068]margallar[/MENTION]

yes we gave ass maths in the same session, my teacher was a kamchor...didn't teach me the last 4 chapters. i worked really hard on the first 20 chapters and got a b. well all that practice paid off...now p1 and m1 seem like a piece of cake...