Playstation Sony: feeling good” about the progress of Blu-ray.

superlative56

Co @dmin
Jan 18, 2007
2,896
9
43
SuperSite Area-56
Despite its launch troubles with PS3, Sony says it’s “feeling good” about the progress of Blu-ray.

The long-term success of PS3 rests largely on take-up of Blu-ray as the next generation DVD platform. PlayStation 3 comes with a Blu-ray drive, which offers comparative value against specific players currently on the market. Blu-ray is up against HD-DVD for dominance of this emerging market.

In an earnings conference call yesterday Rob Wiesenthal, chief financial officer of Sony's U.S. operations said "We are feeling really good about Blu-ray right now, but it is early days."

He added, "In Japan, about 96% of the hardware being sold for high-definition format are coming from the Blu-ray family. It's a format with over 100 different CE manufacturers. Obviously we have the launch coming up in Europe for PS3. So we are feeling very good about that.”

Sony points out that the top five films of last year - as well as the top 11 of 15 - were all released exclusively on Blu-ray.

source:next-gen.biz
 

Chandoo

Resi Evil 4 > Your fav game.
Jan 19, 2007
45,625
2,201
129
S.S Normandy
oh what the hell..


"The first official retail tracking data from Nielsen VideoScan seems to show Blu-ray Disc outselling HD-DVD in unit software sales by a more than 2 to 1 margin, and the gap is widening. According to data reported in Home Media Retailing (you'll find it on page one of the digital edition available on their website) for the week ending 1/7/07, Year-to-Date tracking indicated that for every 47.14 HD-DVDs sold there were 100 Blu-ray Disc titles sold. "

http://www.thedigitalbits.com/#mytwocents
 

USUF

Dont use -blam!-™
Jan 19, 2007
9,955
1
43
33
Karachi
blu-ray has alot more capacity than the HD DVD so obvioulsy it'll have more clearer picture
 

Chandoo

Resi Evil 4 > Your fav game.
Jan 19, 2007
45,625
2,201
129
S.S Normandy
its not about the capacity, the thing is that before the launch of the playstation 3 the only few BD players on the market were absolute crap and they didnt even have a good catalog of movies to display either.

HD DVD got off to a better start, but its run is over now
 

Chandoo

Resi Evil 4 > Your fav game.
Jan 19, 2007
45,625
2,201
129
S.S Normandy
well yes, by far the best blu ray player in the market at this moment is the playstation 3, thats widely accepter over the internet.
 

USUF

Dont use -blam!-™
Jan 19, 2007
9,955
1
43
33
Karachi
hmmm...but i think that the blu-ray format still isnt largely public..i too hadnt heard of a blu-ray format till the PS3 was announced
 

Chandoo

Resi Evil 4 > Your fav game.
Jan 19, 2007
45,625
2,201
129
S.S Normandy
well yeah, as i said, before the PS3 the blu ray format was not that well received but sony was billing the ps3 all the time as the primary blu ray player and that turned out to be true and now as you can see blu ray is outselling HD DVD
 

fady

y so srus?
Jan 22, 2007
2,177
1
43
31
kArAcHI!!
yea thtz true as its the cheapest blue ray player out there....the otherz start frm lyk $1000 .........n these r the cheapest onEz.....so ps3 provides gamin+media center of blueray in $400 less compared to a $1k bd stand alone player........the movie playin is excellenT..........on ps3....a friend has it.....man it roX..........darn to expensiVe
 

fady

y so srus?
Jan 22, 2007
2,177
1
43
31
kArAcHI!!
but for us its expensiV...cause we dun hav any bd movies in our countrY...so watz the use of iT?....nywayz was tht pointEd to mE??.....
 

Chandoo

Resi Evil 4 > Your fav game.
Jan 19, 2007
45,625
2,201
129
S.S Normandy
but for us its expensiV...cause we dun hav any bd movies in our countrY...so watz the use of iT?....nywayz was tht pointEd to mE??.....
no thats a general internet statement, you'll see people whining almost everywhere that the ps3 is expensive waah waah..

as for blu ray movies, eventually the format WILL make its way to pakistan once it really picks up all over the world so dont worry about it.
 

USUF

Dont use -blam!-™
Jan 19, 2007
9,955
1
43
33
Karachi
yeah that tru too but as a gaming console its way too expensive but if you look at the technology thats been put into it then its a bargain beyond any
 

devilscallmedad

Women,Children and Kunka first
Jan 18, 2007
10,239
5
43
34
Rawalpindi
www.worldenow.com
well really no, the blu ray player costs about 200-300 dollars to make the $1000 are just way overpriced.
no thats a general internet statement, you'll see people whining almost everywhere that the ps3 is expensive waah waah..
umm. because it is do you have an extra $600? its about what a person can afford and most people can't afford that much.
 

Chandoo

Resi Evil 4 > Your fav game.
Jan 19, 2007
45,625
2,201
129
S.S Normandy
umm. because it is do you have an extra $600? its about what a person can afford and most people can't afford that much.
its been more then made clear that the technology that comes with the ps3 is far more then 600$ , its a big bargain.

And its a given that with the popularity of blu ray format when people see that the expensive blu ray players are crap, they'll naturally turn to the ps3. Hence the PS3 will fulfill game AND next gen media needs alongside.
 

devilscallmedad

Women,Children and Kunka first
Jan 18, 2007
10,239
5
43
34
Rawalpindi
www.worldenow.com
its been more then made clear that the technology that comes with the ps3 is far more then 600$ , its a big bargain.

And its a given that with the popularity of blu ray format when people see that the expensive blu ray players are crap, they'll naturally turn to the ps3. Hence the PS3 will fulfill game AND next gen media needs alongside.
what if they threw in a random useless gadget with the ps3 and made it even more expensive? simply answer this would you rather have a $300-400 PS3 which can be upgraded with a Blu ray addon or you are happy with a $600 priced PS3 even if you don't want a blu ray player?
 

Chandoo

Resi Evil 4 > Your fav game.
Jan 19, 2007
45,625
2,201
129
S.S Normandy
what if they threw in a random useless gadget with the ps3 and made it even more expensive? simply answer this would you rather have a $300-400 PS3 which can be upgraded with a Blu ray addon or you are happy with a $600 priced PS3 even if you don't want a blu ray player?
we dont have the luxury of that choice now do we, and lets not turn this into a "but the 360 is the same as PS3" discussion.

as for the price, do you really think that the 600 will seem overriced after a year or two ? as its been made clear the blu ray format is the way of the current new video formats hence the blu ray demand will increase tremendously in the coming year. All the better reason to own a PS3 rather then an expensive standalone blu ray only player.
 

devilscallmedad

Women,Children and Kunka first
Jan 18, 2007
10,239
5
43
34
Rawalpindi
www.worldenow.com
we dont have the luxury of that choice now do we, and lets not turn this into a "but the 360 is the same as PS3" discussion.

as for the price, do you really think that the 600 will seem overriced after a year or two ? as its been made clear the blu ray format is the way of the current new video formats hence the blu ray demand will increase tremendously in the coming year. All the better reason to own a PS3 rather then an expensive standalone blu ray only player.
I am happy with my DVD player are you not? who knows what will happen in the next 2 years the blu ray may be winning against HD-DVD but so far both have been what can be called "failures" they haven't gained any momentum.
The point here is $600 is TOO MUCH not matter what you are getting. Hell i am not ready to pay $400 for the 360 because i think that's too expensive as well. Just give me a 200-300 game console i don't really give a crap about movies just make them addons. Want one buy one don't want save your $200.
 

Chandoo

Resi Evil 4 > Your fav game.
Jan 19, 2007
45,625
2,201
129
S.S Normandy
600 may be too much for people like us, but for the americans japanese europeans their equivilent price isnt THAT high (hell im sure you must've read the news items about how the japanese public hates the 20 gig PS3 model and would rather have the more expensive 60 gig model instead). DVD's may stick around for a lot longer too but thats like saying ps2's going to stick around, developers/movie people will want to focus on the next generation of formats as much as they'd want to keep the old one's going because of their high market audience.

DVD's have come a long way and they're most commonly used because of their availability and somewhat cheap prices, but there was a time when DVD's were also going through the phase that blu ray is going through right now.

That being said, the future is still bright for blu ray, and ps3's price will obviously also drop in the year, with the whole 65 nm processor, sony fixing their diode issues and blu ray being accepted more news items on the net you can imagine sony's cost of manufacturing a ps3 has lessened considerably from before.
 
Last edited:
General chit-chat
Help Users
We have disabled traderscore and are working on a fix. There was a bug with the plugin | Click for Discord
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    LegacyGamerGuy said:
    Consoles were my main platform ever since Atari 2500. But now I think it's not worth it as PC especially with DLSS deliver far smoother performance. AW2 on console didn't even had ray tracing and ran below 30fps. Similar issues plagues DD2 on consoled.
    The cross gen era really made people think 60fps would be a new standard lol
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Welp, done with Hellblade 2. Thoroughly disappointed. Such a nothing burger after the unique experience of the first game.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    I have a PS5 but I am not satisfied with the experience. I am currently saving for a 4080 64 GB rig soon. Bit will wait for Pro if performance improves. This gen has been so bad I don't plan on buying consoles anymore for AAA gaming.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Consoles were my main platform ever since Atari 2500. But now I think it's not worth it as PC especially with DLSS deliver far smoother performance. AW2 on console didn't even had ray tracing and ran below 30fps. Similar issues plagues DD2 on consoled.
    Link
  • GloriousChicken GloriousChicken:
    It is indeed the worst generation by far.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Both PS and Xbox have been a flop this gen as they can barely maintain 30 fps in a lot of AAA games th.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    As per WCCF Tech review, Xbox Series X doesn't even maintain a consistent FPS and sometimes drops into the mid-20fps range. That's unacceptable, tbh.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    The Xbox Series X can drop into the mid-20fps range,
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Still, I wonder why the PC Gamer rated it worse than Gollum. 🤔
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    its more on me, than gamepass tbh
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    I am not spending as much time with it these days
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    I feel like with gamepass
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    LegacyGamerGuy said:
    Gradually transitioning from console gaming to PC as the games are not worth it. 6 hours of Hellblade 2 is just not worth the $50 price tag.
    Score 1 for game pass. I wouldn't pay full price for this at retail either.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Gradually transitioning from console gaming to PC as the games are not worth it. 6 hours of Hellblade 2 is just not worth the $50 price tag.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Just downloaded my first legit digital PC game on GoG at a discount of $8: Two Point Hospital. The same team behind Theme Hospital Two Point Studios now part of Sega. And I am having more fun than most recent AAA games except of course BG3.
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    gottdamnnn HB2 looks amazing. UE5 finally living up to its potential.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Still, I don't like either Sony or Microsoft as they are focusing more on corporate greed than delighting customers. PC gaming is best of gaming and worth every penny.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    PC Gamer score of 58/100 for Hellblade 2??? Is it really worse than Gollum that was 64/100? Microsoft games can't even come close to high scores of Sony exclusives apparently.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Chandoo said:
    Hellblade 2 83 OpenCritic, not bad at all. 2 points higher than the first game.
    first one is 84 Opencritic. Saga dropped to 82.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Saeen abhi tak to first one was better in every way. Atleast the first hour-ish
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    Hellblade 2 83 OpenCritic, not bad at all. 2 points higher than the first game.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    About the Microsoft (and Sony) debate, I feel both have become too greedy and losing their minds over corporate greed. Personally, I will never buy any console next gen and switch to PC gaming where democracy reins.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    No news about Google Play Store hacking. What is the source?
    Link
  • Link
  • Aciel Aciel:
    This is the error.
    Link
    Necrokiller Necrokiller: Consoles were my main platform ever since Atari 2500. But now I think it's not worth it as PC...