Tracing route to 13.67.60.237 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms R1.lan [192.168.88.1]
2 2 ms 6 ms 3 ms 192.168.10.1
3 14 ms 8 ms 9 ms 182.176.0.108
4 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms 10.55.0.34
5 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms 182.176.139.193
6 10 ms 11 ms 11 ms 182.176.139.222
7 32 ms 45 ms 32 ms 10.2.1.10
8 34 ms 33 ms 30 ms static-10GE-KHI494-P01-KHI494-SWB.pie.net.pk [202.125.128.157]
9 34 ms 33 ms 34 ms static.khi77.pie.net.pk [202.125.128.135]
10 110 ms 108 ms 109 ms habib-rafiq.khi77d2.pie.net.pk [202.125.129.218]
11 111 ms 112 ms 111 ms 8075.sgw.equinix.com [27.111.228.57]
12 111 ms 113 ms 112 ms ae0-0.sge-96cbe-1b.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.225.30]
13 113 ms 115 ms 113 ms ae38-0.icr02.sg2.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.236.146]
14 * * * Request timed out.
15 * * * Request timed out.
Tracing route to 40.69.36.69 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms R1.lan [192.168.88.1]
2 4 ms 3 ms 3 ms 192.168.10.1
3 28 ms 34 ms 8 ms 182.176.0.108
4 11 ms 9 ms 10 ms 10.55.0.38
5 9 ms 11 ms 10 ms 182.176.139.193
6 9 ms 10 ms 8 ms 182.176.139.222
7 32 ms 32 ms 32 ms 10.2.1.10
8 33 ms 30 ms 30 ms static-10GE-KHI494-P01-KHI494-SWB.pie.net.pk [202.125.128.157]
9 33 ms 30 ms 34 ms rwp44.pie.net.pk [221.120.248.43]
10 163 ms * 162 ms khi77.pie.net.pk [202.125.134.22]
11 155 ms 153 ms 153 ms ams-ix-1.microsoft.com [80.249.209.20]
12 175 ms 173 ms 175 ms be-62-0.ibr01.ams.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.9.142]
13 169 ms 169 ms 170 ms be-6-0.ibr01.dub30.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.4.142]
14 172 ms 177 ms 170 ms be-4-0.ibr01.dub07.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.7.51]
15 170 ms 169 ms 171 ms ae101-0.icr01.dub08.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.11.63]
I'll be able to do a better check when I'm on my PC, but although the second trace has much lower pings than TW, I've noticed generally, PIE is 20ms or so slower.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Edit: I did a trace from Nayatel (yes, wrong ISP thread) and it routes the requests via PIE - guess it's not all rosey for Nayatel users (edit 2: I've added PTCL DSL traceroutes as well; the IP the modem is assigned is 39.40.176.xxx, since some people say it matters on the IP):
Tracing route to 13.67.60.237 over a maximum of 30 hops (Nayatel)
1 2 ms 2 ms 1 ms ontdevice.Home [192.168.2.254]
2 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms 58-65-175-240.nayatel.pk [58.65.175.240]
3 4 ms 3 ms 5 ms 58-65-175-105.nayatel.pk [58.65.175.105]
4 5 ms 4 ms 5 ms 58-65-175-62.nayatel.pk [58.65.175.62]
5 6 ms 9 ms 6 ms rwp44.pie.net.pk [221.120.237.101]
6 38 ms 38 ms 37 ms rwp44.pie.net.pk [221.120.251.251]
7 35 ms 36 ms 37 ms static.khi77.pie.net.pk [202.125.128.135]
8 115 ms 116 ms 115 ms habib-rafiq.khi77d2.pie.net.pk [202.125.129.218]
9 116 ms 114 ms 115 ms 8075.sgw.equinix.com [27.111.228.57]
10 135 ms 115 ms 117 ms ae28-0.icr01.sg2.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.236.136]
11 * * * Request timed out.
Tracing route to 13.67.60.237 over a maximum of 30 hops (PTCL DSL)
1 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms 192.168.1.1
2 10 ms 9 ms 10 ms 182.176.0.121
3 144 ms 213 ms 191 ms 10.19.19.5
4 10 ms 11 ms 11 ms 10.0.2.2
5 39 ms 36 ms 36 ms 10.2.1.6
6 37 ms 38 ms 37 ms rwp44.pie.net.pk [221.120.248.52]
7 41 ms 39 ms 37 ms static.khi77.pie.net.pk [202.125.128.135]
8 371 ms 204 ms 117 ms habib-rafiq.khi77d2.pie.net.pk [202.125.129.218]
9 120 ms 120 ms 131 ms 8075.sgw.equinix.com [27.111.228.57]
10 137 ms 137 ms 139 ms ae0-0.sge-96cbe-1b.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.225.30]
11 124 ms 123 ms 124 ms ae38-0.icr02.sg2.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.236.146]
12 * * * Request timed out.
Tracing route to 40.69.36.69 over a maximum of 30 hops (Nayatel)
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms ontdevice.Home [192.168.2.254]
2 5 ms 3 ms 3 ms 58-65-175-240.nayatel.pk [58.65.175.240]
3 7 ms 4 ms 4 ms 58-65-175-105.nayatel.pk [58.65.175.105]
4 5 ms 4 ms 4 ms 58-65-175-62.nayatel.pk [58.65.175.62]
5 9 ms 8 ms 5 ms rwp44.pie.net.pk [221.120.237.101]
6 36 ms 40 ms 32 ms rwp44.pie.net.pk [221.120.251.255]
7 35 ms 33 ms 34 ms hi77c2-Sw494b.pie.net.pk [202.125.128.134]
8 * * 244 ms khi77.pie.net.pk [202.125.134.22]
9 232 ms 235 ms 235 ms ams-ix-1.microsoft.com [80.249.209.20]
10 245 ms 248 ms 246 ms be-62-0.ibr01.ams.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.9.142]
11 369 ms 245 ms 307 ms be-6-0.ibr01.dub30.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.4.142]
12 245 ms 276 ms 326 ms be-4-0.ibr01.dub07.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.7.51]
13 250 ms 280 ms 245 ms ae100-0.icr01.dub07.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.11.60]
14 * * * Request timed out.
15 * * * Request timed out.
Tracing route to 40.69.36.69 over a maximum of 30 hops (PTCL DSL)
1 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms 192.168.1.1
2 99 ms 13 ms 9 ms 182.176.0.121
3 30 ms 11 ms 10 ms 10.19.19.5
4 236 ms 11 ms 11 ms 10.0.2.2
5 33 ms 35 ms 33 ms 10.2.1.6
6 38 ms 37 ms 38 ms static-10GE-KHI494-P01-KHI494-SWA.pie.net.pk [202.125.128.174]
7 36 ms 37 ms 39 ms rwp44.pie.net.pk [221.120.248.43]
8 * 168 ms * khi77.pie.net.pk [202.125.134.22]
9 162 ms 161 ms 162 ms ams-ix-1.microsoft.com [80.249.209.20]
10 187 ms 187 ms 187 ms be-62-0.ibr01.ams.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.9.142]
11 188 ms 188 ms 187 ms be-6-0.ibr01.dub30.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.4.142]
12 186 ms 186 ms 187 ms be-4-0.ibr01.dub07.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.7.51]
13 185 ms 185 ms 185 ms ae102-0.icr02.dub07.ntwk.msn.net [104.44.11.56]
14 * * * Request timed out.
Anyway - I guess the IP address theory doesn't exactly hold, and it's pretty much randomly assigned at the internet exchange end/ISP-end.