Milking the franchise? :lol:
Go and read the AC Storyline first. -_- Each number corresponds to an assasin so AC1= Altair AC2= Ezio's story and ACIII will feature a new story, as for why we need AC3:
1) AC2, brotherhood and revelations endings. Watch them again and the truth files.
Besides, I don't see why there is a need to complain about a game a year, Alexander Amancio clearly said that several studies develop the AC franchise so the actual deveopment time is much longer, they just develop more resources to it and considering how much of an improvement AC2 was over AC1 and how good Revelatons and Brotherhood were AS MERE EXPANSION packs, AC3 should be freakin awesome.
---------- Post added at 03:46 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:42 AM ----------
Little to no improvements in the game and they keep pumping them out.
1) Combat has improved alot since AC1, Assasins creed has easily the best sword based combat system of any game.
2) Graphics have improved, though not by much.
3) The enviroments improved, Brotherhood is a great example for that.
4) The story is not boring one bit, it improves as you go on and you don't get the feeling its overly dramatic or anything.
5) Ezio's story was awesome, and there is quite alot of meaning to it (for those that actually concentrate on the story, so none of you people in this thread obviously
)
Thats good enough I think for a game as unique in style as AC1 (even those that didnt like it due to its MANY flaws agreed it was completely new).
@Everyone else:
And you compare all this to Call of duty, which in no way whatsoever has brought ANYTHING new to the FPS genre whatsoever ?
---------- Post added at 03:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:46 AM ----------
suddenly we can save the world and give everyone a free choice? (sm1)
Uuh that "suddenly" is actually from the 12th century to the 21st one, not what I'd call spontaneous?