Galaxy S IV’s specifications leak, confirm Exynos Octa & PowerVR SGX 544MP

farrukhna

Active member
Aug 14, 2008
488
1
23
Sammobile, which has almost everytime has been a reliable source posted this just right now....

and they r now being confirmed : http://www.sammobile.com/2013/03/06...n-variant-have-just-showed-up-new-ui-changes/

p.s. can admin decrease the size of snaps pleasE? thanks :)

Somebody with a Galaxy S IV has just performed an Antutu benchmark and revealed all the specifications of the device! It looks like the Galaxy S IV features an Exynos Octa 5410 CPU clocked at 1.8GHz, PowerVR SGX 544MP GPU, 2GB of RAM, 4.99″ Full HD (1920×1080) display and a 13 Megapixel Camera. The device also runs Android 4.2 out of the box. The Galaxy S IV retains the menu, back and home buttons, like its predecessors.
The most interesting thing is that the device supports GSM/WCDMA/LTE networks with an Exynos processor on-board. So that means there will be only a one single variant of the device, the GT-I9500. Previously, Samsung used to release two variants of their high-end devices, for example the GT-I9300 and GT-I9305. One variant used to have GSM connectivity and the other one had LTE connectivity but this is not the case with the Galaxy S IV. The Galaxy S IV will be a world phone.
 
Last edited:

HAMMER of THOR

الله اکب
Nov 17, 2007
6,193
0
41
lahore dude
never go for rumors man.. these are mostly prototype devices that someone steals a look at... only 11 days remaining.. you can make a thread then...
 

sohaib50k

Lalalalalala
Oct 5, 2010
2,932
2
43
Islamabad
Nice, the gpu benches are same, even though its a full hd screen vs a 720p one.
But 544mp is kinda old, i bet they used 4 cores or more.
 

saadleo

Commander of the M17x legion!
Sep 25, 2009
205
0
21
Islamabad
Re: Galaxy S IV’s specifications leak, confirm Exynos Octa & PowerVR SGX 544MP

Coming from Apple background, I must say that it's utterly foolish to think of Android as a slow / 'stuttering' OS. Buy a better android fone with latest specs and you'll enjoy the new world. My only concern was of messaging but even that got resolved with the use of 'swift key'.

As for the s4 specs, don't forget the 99 % faster browsing speeds than any other devices in the market; saw a leaked browsing mark score.

To be honest, I'll stick with the note 2 if samsung comes up with the same 'plasticy' build.

Sent from my Galaxy Note II
 
Last edited:

farrukhna

Active member
Aug 14, 2008
488
1
23
Coming from Apple background, I must say that it's utterly foolish to think of Android as a slow / 'stuttering' OS. Buy a better android fone with latest specs and you'll enjoy the new world. My only concern was of messaging but even that got resolved with the use of 'swift key'.

As for the s4 specs, don't forget the 99 % faster browsing speeds than any other devices in the market; saw a leaked browsing mark score.

To be honest, I'll stick with the note 2 if samsung comes up with the same 'plasticy' build.

Sent from my Galaxy Note II
so true, i will also stick to my GS3 which i love so much, if i S4 will be same old crappy plastic like of SGS3
 

Lord Ammar

Expert
Nov 7, 2009
11,261
4
44
35
Rawalpindi
Coming from Apple background, I must say that it's utterly foolish to think of Android as a slow / 'stuttering' OS. Buy a better android fone with latest specs and you'll enjoy the new world. My only concern was of messaging but even that got resolved with the use of 'swift key'.

As for the s4 specs, don't forget the 99 % faster browsing speeds than any other devices in the market; saw a leaked browsing mark score.

To be honest, I'll stick with the note 2 if samsung comes up with the same 'plasticy' build.

Sent from my Galaxy Note II
I used Galaxy Note II. Doesn't get any higher end than that. 3rd party apps like Viber and Facebook made it seem like I was using a 5 year old phone.
 

HAMMER of THOR

الله اکب
Nov 17, 2007
6,193
0
41
lahore dude
I used Galaxy Note II. Doesn't get any higher end than that. 3rd party apps like Viber and Facebook made it seem like I was using a 5 year old phone.
did you use 4.1.1 or 4.1.2?? 4.1.1 was quite laggy and the later is a lot better... they have increased the fluidity of the os and everything and all the built in apps... but ofcourse, some third party apps do lag a bit... that won't happen on ios as everything is tailor made for a device in that os...
 

jaysoogle1

Intermediate
Jul 21, 2010
156
0
21
Khi
im a heavy Appaholic i dont feel any kind of stutter or lag on 4.1.1 as well as on 4.1.2 on my GS3 ...onething which i hate about android is keyboard Accuracy used Alot of diff keyboards but nothin is close to IOS keyboards interms accuracy and precision
 

HAMMER of THOR

الله اکب
Nov 17, 2007
6,193
0
41
lahore dude
im a heavy Appaholic i dont feel any kind of stutter or lag on 4.1.1 as well as on 4.1.2 on my GS3 ...onething which i hate about android is keyboard Accuracy used Alot of diff keyboards but nothin is close to IOS keyboards interms accuracy and precision
i have used s3 quite a bit and i can assure you that is 10 times laggier than the note2... the 4.1.1 update was horrible... anyways, my note2 does not lag doing anything... i don't use many apps... just browser and games and media players... i don't use useless facebooks apps as i just use the browser to open a desktop version of the site because i hate the mobile versions...
 

gttx

Well-known member
Oct 5, 2007
1,160
0
41
Lahore
Re: Galaxy S IV’s specifications leak, confirm Exynos Octa & PowerVR SGX 544MP

i have used s3 quite a bit and i can assure you that is 10 times laggier than the note2... the 4.1.1 update was horrible... anyways, my note2 does not lag doing anything... i don't use many apps... just browser and games and media players... i don't use useless facebooks apps as i just use the browser to open a desktop version of the site because i hate the mobile versions...

The s3 lags alot. I use it and currently on 4'1'2

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
 

optimus950

Proficient
Jul 4, 2010
662
9
23
i have used s3 quite a bit and i can assure you that is 10 times laggier than the note2... the 4.1.1 update was horrible... anyways, my note2 does not lag doing anything... i don't use many apps... just browser and games and media players... i don't use useless facebooks apps as i just use the browser to open a desktop version of the site because i hate the mobile versions...
The s3 lags alot. I use it and currently on 4'1'2

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

Go to settings then advance settings n change both window & transition to 0.5.

In svoice settings > uncheck the launch svoice with double tap of home button.

Coz the phone waits to see if you press the home button twice to activate s-voice....these two settings really help to fix this issue.

And turn off power saving mode too, it also cause lags.
 
Last edited:

crysis2

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2008
1,912
0
41
Karachi
Re: Galaxy S IV’s specifications leak, confirm Exynos Octa & PowerVR SGX 544MP

the power vr 554 is already used in ipad 4
so why samsung are using the power vr 544.
maybe galaxy s5 will use 554.
 

saadleo

Commander of the M17x legion!
Sep 25, 2009
205
0
21
Islamabad
I used Galaxy Note II. Doesn't get any higher end than that. 3rd party apps like Viber and Facebook made it seem like I was using a 5 year old phone.
True dat! I have been having a few issues myself but let's not take them against OS's fluidity.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
We have disabled traderscore and are working on a fix. There was a bug with the plugin | Click for Discord
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    BTW, i started Ghost of Tsushima, and it got me hooked within the first couple of minutes. I already know It's gonna be a memorable experience. This is how you make a proper Samurai game. Not that SJW game Ubisoft is making.
    Link
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    Necrokiller said:
    Hellblade 2 has a lower peak player count than Redfall 😬
    That's still higher than it's total play length. A 5 hour campaign for a $50 game is downright scammy.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Hellblade 2 has a lower peak player count than Redfall 😬
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    LegacyGamerGuy said:
    Consoles were my main platform ever since Atari 2500. But now I think it's not worth it as PC especially with DLSS deliver far smoother performance. AW2 on console didn't even had ray tracing and ran below 30fps. Similar issues plagues DD2 on consoled.
    The cross gen era really made people think 60fps would be a new standard lol
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Welp, done with Hellblade 2. Thoroughly disappointed. Such a nothing burger after the unique experience of the first game.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    I have a PS5 but I am not satisfied with the experience. I am currently saving for a 4080 64 GB rig soon. Bit will wait for Pro if performance improves. This gen has been so bad I don't plan on buying consoles anymore for AAA gaming.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Consoles were my main platform ever since Atari 2500. But now I think it's not worth it as PC especially with DLSS deliver far smoother performance. AW2 on console didn't even had ray tracing and ran below 30fps. Similar issues plagues DD2 on consoled.
    Link
  • GloriousChicken GloriousChicken:
    It is indeed the worst generation by far.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Both PS and Xbox have been a flop this gen as they can barely maintain 30 fps in a lot of AAA games th.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    As per WCCF Tech review, Xbox Series X doesn't even maintain a consistent FPS and sometimes drops into the mid-20fps range. That's unacceptable, tbh.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    The Xbox Series X can drop into the mid-20fps range,
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Still, I wonder why the PC Gamer rated it worse than Gollum. 🤔
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    its more on me, than gamepass tbh
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    I am not spending as much time with it these days
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    I feel like with gamepass
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    LegacyGamerGuy said:
    Gradually transitioning from console gaming to PC as the games are not worth it. 6 hours of Hellblade 2 is just not worth the $50 price tag.
    Score 1 for game pass. I wouldn't pay full price for this at retail either.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Gradually transitioning from console gaming to PC as the games are not worth it. 6 hours of Hellblade 2 is just not worth the $50 price tag.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Just downloaded my first legit digital PC game on GoG at a discount of $8: Two Point Hospital. The same team behind Theme Hospital Two Point Studios now part of Sega. And I am having more fun than most recent AAA games except of course BG3.
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    gottdamnnn HB2 looks amazing. UE5 finally living up to its potential.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Still, I don't like either Sony or Microsoft as they are focusing more on corporate greed than delighting customers. PC gaming is best of gaming and worth every penny.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    PC Gamer score of 58/100 for Hellblade 2??? Is it really worse than Gollum that was 64/100? Microsoft games can't even come close to high scores of Sony exclusives apparently.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Chandoo said:
    Hellblade 2 83 OpenCritic, not bad at all. 2 points higher than the first game.
    first one is 84 Opencritic. Saga dropped to 82.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Saeen abhi tak to first one was better in every way. Atleast the first hour-ish
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    Hellblade 2 83 OpenCritic, not bad at all. 2 points higher than the first game.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    About the Microsoft (and Sony) debate, I feel both have become too greedy and losing their minds over corporate greed. Personally, I will never buy any console next gen and switch to PC gaming where democracy reins.
    Link
    XPremiuM XPremiuM: BTW, i started Ghost of Tsushima, and it got me hooked within the first couple of minutes. I...