Motion to BANNING signatures from PG

devilscallmedad

Women,Children and Kunka first
Jan 18, 2007
10,239
5
43
34
Rawalpindi
www.worldenow.com
I hereby propose that we should no more have signatures.

They make the site look overfull and unattractive, i think a rather simple look i.e Avatars + Post would be much more beneficial.

Also i am calling on a ban for all sigs be it picture or text.
 

Crow

Seasoned
Jan 22, 2007
3,415
4
44
I second this notion. A community devoid of signatures looks more sophisticated and mature.

Although there's nothing wrong with text in signatures IMO. I mean, really, it's just signatures.
 

Atif

Ancient Philosopher
Jan 18, 2007
4,222
6
43
41
From Mars
I disagree with that notion of baning the signatures.Sig are good and to me skin of the site.So don't ban them.
 

iNF3RN0

PG Founder
ADMIN
Jan 17, 2007
5,857
22
44
Karachi
www.pakgamers.com
Signatures will stay, but unfortunately I am seeing now many users using big sigs as well as walls of texts or big fat links in their signatures which is indeed making the site unattractive and unprofessional..

New Rule:

- No Animated Sigs..

- Only one sig image (within 400x120 size limit) or 2 lines of text (2 lines of text @ 1024x768 resolution) or 2 userbars only..noting else

- Active members can add two links (one per line) using a normal size font underneath their image sig..nothing more then that..

The image size should be strictly within the allowed sig image size..anything 2% larger then the allowed size should be removed..

Mods, please remove all the over size sigs, bold/fat/big links (make them into normal font size) etc also this rule is also valid for PG staff as well..so chandoo lets start from you :D

Thanks,
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
We have disabled traderscore and are working on a fix. There was a bug with the plugin | Click for Discord
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    Necrokiller Necrokiller: Hmmmmm