Group logos

[Crow]

Am I the only one who thinks that the logos for groups/clubs should be confined and more conformed? I mean people are making logos of large proportions, I don't think with logos that large you'd be able to fit much in the rest of your signature.

I say make logos of standard sizes, i.e. 50 x 50, 31 x 88, 150 x 50. Opinions?

 

[Khawaja]

100x100 is enough

 

[Atif]

I say only single signatures and the guys who have logos + sig must remove one thing. and the size should be small as @Arsal said.

 

[Conscript]

Agreed. The people who have slow internet may have problem browsing the forums.

 

[Chandoo]

or you could just use image compression and set a set size for images ?

 

[devilscallmedad]

What's a group logo ?

 

[r3aper]

or you could just use image compression and set a set size for images ?

yes....thats what i did
size of my logo <30kb and same pics on a page needs to be loaded once

What's a group logo ?

Check out the orange badge in my sig....

Agreed. The people who have slow internet may have problem browsing the forums.

these species does not exist.....

 

[Crow]

But 130 x 110 is too big. Make it smaller!

 

[r3aper]

what about this one?

 

[Desolator]

Hmmm i think the logos should be included to the Achievements. Or a subsection showing the logos of the groups.

 

[iNF3RN0]

a group logo should not exceed the 90x90 pixel dimensions! and keep it within a single line beside your sig (don't add the logo below your sig).

Also I am noticing that most of the members don't really care about the sig size..all those sigs will be removed any time without any prior warning!