Do we have free will?
- Thread starter munsifb
- Start date
- Status
It should make sense at the sub-atomic level as well but it doesn't. I have little doubt Schroedinger/Heisenberg equations would make lesser sense if we go further deep.
It will make sense if you understand it correctly but Noah's ark story. Really ?
Sent from my Spaceship using PTCL
^What's up with the Noah(A.S)'s ark story? What's so far-fetched about it?
Still more believable than some of the things scientists come up with :laugh1:
Still more believable than some of the things scientists come up with :laugh1:
plz enlighten us about pre big bang era using ur scientific approach
if u r arguing over Noah AS story then I m afraid miraculous birth of Esa AS is also going to trouble u as it is biologically impossible
That's where blind faith comes in
Last edited:
Time didn't exist before the before the big bang. I cannot answer your question right now but I can say scientists were able to create matter with vacuum
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
I believe aslisarmachar has answered your question to some extent. Now tell me whats your approach of pre big bang era ?plz enlighten us about pre big bang era using ur scientific approach
Sent from my Spaceship using PTCL
in a controlled environment.. they didn't create matter out of thin air
and ur own statement "scientists were able to create matter", there were no scientist so who ignited big bang?
some force must hav triggered matter to explode what was that force?
Last edited:
he didn't answer any of my question. see my reply to his post and well my approach is clear. blind faith in matters of religion
only Allah knows what happened before the creation of time and space.Now ur turn prove big bang theory and infrom us about pre big bang era using ur scientific approach
I don't understand the first question, what about the decades?. If the choice you're going to make is TOTALLY created, shaped and caused by external influences than free will doesn't exist. because that free 'you' is an illusion.
you don't think your brain has any neurons ? or any other parts mine has? you think the 'you' in there is a big ball of magic light?
There is no such thing as blind faith. Faith is itself blind. As for the answer I dont know what was before the big bang. But do answer my question now you are saying something must have created this universe then who created the creator? But please dont say we are not allowed to dwell in such topics.he didn't answer any of my question. see my reply to his post and well my approach is clear. blind faith in matters of religion
Now ur turn prove big bang theory and infrom us about pre big bang era using ur scientific approach
This is becoming more of a science vs religion thread but since so many of people are using scientific 'facts' to support their arguments here is my view on it.
You cannot disprove (or prove) religious concepts with scientific theories. Why? Because scientific truths are transient while religious truth is for all times.
For hundreds of years the greatest scientists and philosophers of the world told us that earth is at the centre of the universe and everyone believed them. Then Galileo and Copernicus came along and told us that we are revolving around the sun in circular orbits and we started believing them. A few years later Newton came up with his theories and told us that the orbits are not circular but elliptical. We believed Newton for a couple of centuries until Einstein decided that Newtonian mechanics should go out the window and quantum physics and relativity are the real deal. Thus there has not been any period in history whose 'scientific truth' has survived more than a couple of generations.
At least the religious folks are sticking to the same story for fourteen hundred years
You cannot disprove (or prove) religious concepts with scientific theories. Why? Because scientific truths are transient while religious truth is for all times.
For hundreds of years the greatest scientists and philosophers of the world told us that earth is at the centre of the universe and everyone believed them. Then Galileo and Copernicus came along and told us that we are revolving around the sun in circular orbits and we started believing them. A few years later Newton came up with his theories and told us that the orbits are not circular but elliptical. We believed Newton for a couple of centuries until Einstein decided that Newtonian mechanics should go out the window and quantum physics and relativity are the real deal. Thus there has not been any period in history whose 'scientific truth' has survived more than a couple of generations.
At least the religious folks are sticking to the same story for fourteen hundred years
^If u don't know what was before big bang and u don't hav blind faith, how do u expect me to give an answer to that absurd question? Allah Swt didn't tell us what was before him, maybe he will tell us after "qiyamah". but u don't believe in dooms day if u don't believe in creator so who is gonna tell u what was before big bang? ur flesh made scientists? :lol:
Mods: please use ur free will and close this thread as it's turning into a religious discussion and leading towards shirk
ur flesh made scientists? :lol:Mods: please use ur free will and close this thread as it's turning into a religious discussion and leading towards shirk
I have to agree with you there my friend. Blind faith indeed.plz enlighten us about pre big bang era using ur scientific approach
if u r arguing over Noah AS story then I m afraid miraculous birth of Esa AS is also going to trouble u as it is biologically impossible
That's where blind faith comes in
- Status
We have disabled traderscore and are working on a fix. There was a bug with the plugin | Click for Discord
- No one is chatting at the moment.
-
Necrokiller:
Phil should be held responsible for this shitfest too, just like Sarah, but it's highly likely that these decisions are coming from Satya. And this isn't even the end of it. More closures are coming. -
SolitarySoldier:
if we are moving towards more and more popular trash across platforms that make billions for companies, I'm happy with all the barriers and exclusivity because at least that brings some pressure to create good stuff. -
SolitarySoldier:
Phil keeps talking about breaking barriers to gaming, making it accessible on all platforms yada yada, while killing competition and creativity at the same time. the fact that i actually believed him for a second lol
-
SolitarySoldier:
"These changes are not a reflection of the creativity and skill of the talented individuals at these teams or the risks they took to try new things" ... seems to me that's exactly what it is
-
XPremiuM:
Microsoft deserves all the hate they can get. Seriously i can't explain how much i want to curse them out. -
XPremiuM:
They could've sold the studios instead of closing them, but the nazi bastards just didn't want competition down the road.
-
XPremiuM:
What's the f*** is wrong with them? I mean really? Have they completely lost it? F***ing retards.
-
XPremiuM:
So i just found out that f***ing s***bag Microsoft shut down Arkane Studio (makers of the brilliant Dishonored series) and Tango Gameworks (makers of the iconic The Evil Within series), among some other studios. I just want to say a giant F*** Y**! to Microsoft. THEY'VE F***ED UP BIG TIME this time.
-
XPremiuM:
Started Dead Island 2, and i find it pretty lame. The story is shit. The characters are either cringe or bland (all 6 of them), The gameplay isn't fun. Even the goddamn zombies don't behave like proper zombies. They're all fast & intelligent unlike how zombies are supposed to be like. Any fan of "zombie" genre cannot possibly like this shitfest of a game. Dying Light 2 was million times better than this shit.
-
faraany3k:
tbh gaming industry as a whole is failing much like tech industry. They have buckled down too much to Corporate suites then relying on passionate and innovative people. A corporate only believes in financial growth and shareholders.Necrokiller said:
