PC Call of Duty: World at War Q & A

adnanbaig18

diablo cazador
Sep 10, 2008
425
0
21
Lahore
Q & A from Project lead: Cesar Statsny


SOURCE: GAMESPOT


We get some new intel on the PC version of this upcoming World War II shooter.



Many modern first-person shooters combine the adrenaline rush of dashing around 3D environments while shooting anything that isn't you with gritty, realistic settings that heighten the tension. Last year's outstanding Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, developed by Infinity Ward, was a great example of excellent technology meeting a strong game setting and terrific, action-packed gameplay. And now the Call of Duty series will make its return to the theater of war known as World War II with Call of Duty: World at War, in development at Treyarch. Though the game was originally announced for consoles, it will also make its way to the PC. We have new details from Treyarch's project lead Cesar Statsny.

Call of Duty returns to World War II, and to the PC, with World at War.


GameSpot: The last Call of Duty game developed by Treyarch, Call of Duty 3, didn't make an appearance on the PC platform. Why have you decided to bring World at War to the PC?
Cesar Stastny: Consoles are great fun and I am a big fan. But I am an old-school PC gamer at heart who believes in the supremacy of keyboard and mouse for first-person shooters. The PC community wants better precision, configurability, and the opportunity to play on faster processors at higher resolutions. They want to play the same game that their friends get to play on 360 and PS3, but they also want to create and play mods.
We get it: more awesomeness, please. Well, we are PC gamers and we want all of these things too.
GS: You've shown off some exciting new features in Call of Duty: World at War, including four-player online co-op. Will all of the announced features make it into the PC version, and are you planning cross-platform play? CS: Yes, the PC version has the same features as Xbox 360 and PS3, but implemented in a way that makes sense on PC. We do not have split-screen co-op, for example. We are not planning cross-platform play. Instead, we are focused on making the PC experience as fun as possible. Four-player online co-op is incredibly fun on PC!
GS: After Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare made the leap to modern combat, it was somewhat of a surprise to learn that you were taking the franchise back to the World War II setting. What was your inspiration for this blast-from-the-past decision?
CS: Treyarch actually starting [working on] Call of Duty: World at War a year before Modern Warfare hit the shelves. I doubt that many people would have been very surprised back then, since all the titles in the COD series up to that point were set in WWII. So we set out to create the best of that genre. As surprises go, I think you will like this one.
GS: Are there any other PC-specific features you can tell us about in Call of Duty: World at War?
CS: Our goal is to bring the same game experience to multiple platforms, and I think we are hitting our mark. That said, my team is very consciously making a PC title with a focus on all the things we love about PC gaming. COD:WAW looks fantastic in higher PC resolutions than you can get on a console. It plays great on high-end rigs, but we've optimized for more-modest gear, too. The PC version is more configurable with respect to controls, graphics, and performance options. And support for mods--not just multiplayer but co-op mods too!
GS: How has Infinity Ward's COD4 engine helped you in development of Call of Duty: World at War?
CS: The COD4 engine gave us a solid foundation on which to build this game. You can't beat it for next-gen cross-platform development with excellent lighting and scripting. This allowed us to concentrate on creating content, developing new types of gameplay features like cooperative multiplayer, graphical improvements, new effects, integrating our own networking technology, optimizations, and so forth.
GS: Speaking of COD4, that game featured one of the most robust and addicting online multiplayer modes we've seen in a while, and you've taken another page from Infinity Ward's book by including persistent ranks and stats in your own multiplayer mode. You've also added a new squad mechanic. Tell us how online squads work.
CS: Squads make it easier to play with your friends while helping to keep your team organized into groups. This is particularly fun on our large multiplayer maps.
GS: What vehicles will be playable in Call of Duty: World at War? Can they be used cooperatively with friends?
CS: Yes, tanks are best enjoyed with friends.
GS: You've announced plans for a public multiplayer beta on the PC and Xbox 360. How can players sign up, and what can they expect from the play test?
CS: Players can expect to get a taste of some of the new weapons and attachments while still enjoying the fast-paced action that they know is Call of Duty. We are excited to bring back some game types that are favorites around the office, but more details about that and how to get into the PC beta will be coming soon. To get into the Xbox 360 beta, players should register at the official Call of Duty Web site.

GS: So far, Call of Duty: World at War appears to be a graphically intense game. What system requirements will PC gamers need to jump into the fray? The PC version of the game will offer support for higher-end graphics and pretty much all content and features from the console versions.


CS: My team worked closely with hardware vendors such as Intel and Nvidia to optimize for various hardware configurations available on PC. This was especially important as we are really pushing the limits of the engine. So we were able to achieve this graphical intensity with only a modest bump in the minimum requirements from COD4:

Processor: AMD 64 3200+/Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz or better
Memory: 8 GB free hard-drive space, 512MB RAM (XP)/1GB RAM (Vista)
Graphics: Shader 3.0 or better, 256MB Nvidia GeForce 6600GT/ATI Radeon 1600XT or better

GS: Finally, how do you think Call of Duty: World at War will separate itself from the number of other excellent first-person shooters on the PC platform?
CS: We started with the technology from the best FPS available. We cranked up the graphics and audio. We ratcheted up the hardcore intensity. We kept the awesome multiplayer. We added vehicles and squads and co-op. Can I go play now?
GS: Fair enough. Thanks, Cesar.
 

adnanbaig18

diablo cazador
Sep 10, 2008
425
0
21
Lahore
You can actually get higher resolution and better graphics on PC than on console if you have a better rig... They are more sharper...
<-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
Requirements again good as previous one.
Yep very nice requirement so anyone can play the rich multiplayer options like COD4:MW
 
Last edited:

MrJayPlays

Senior
May 4, 2008
8,502
0
41
www.youtube.com
Processor: AMD 64 3200+/Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz or better
Memory: 8 GB free hard-drive space, 512MB RAM (XP)/1GB RAM (Vista)
Graphics: Shader 3.0 or better, 256MB Nvidia GeForce 6600GT/ATI Radeon 1600XT or better
AHH..sweet n Nice..again COD had proved to be the best..(1)
 

azharkhan

# Runnig Away
Jul 16, 2008
2,820
0
41
Lahore
Processor: AMD 64 3200+/Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz or better
Memory: 8 GB free hard-drive space, 512MB RAM (XP)/1GB RAM (Vista)
Graphics: Shader 3.0 or better, 256MB Nvidia GeForce 6600GT/ATI Radeon 1600XT or better



Pretty good requirements.......!!!(y)
Although instead of a 6600 there should be 6800GT i guess.......!!!:D
Coz now games requirements are moving or should be moved from a 6600 to 6800.........!!!(y)
 

Sire Ahsan

Knighted by the Queen of L33T
Jan 30, 2008
5,735
1
44
Karachi, Pakistan
Cesar Stastny: Consoles are great fun and I am a big fan. But I am an old-school PC gamer at heart who believes in the supremacy of keyboard and mouse for first-person shooters. The PC community wants better precision, configurability, and the opportunity to play on faster processors at higher resolutions. They want to play the same game that their friends get to play on 360 and PS3, but they also want to create and play mods.
We get it: more awesomeness, please. Well, we are PC gamers and we want all of these things too.


AHO!

:D
<-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
The Graphics are great !! But they honestly can't be better then those of PS3 or Xbox 360

You seriously haven't played Crysis in all its glory have you ? :p
 
Last edited:
General chit-chat
Help Users
IMPORTANT: Please Change Your Passwords to avoid being botted. | Click for Discord
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    BTW, i started Ghost of Tsushima, and it got me hooked within the first couple of minutes. I already know It's gonna be a memorable experience. This is how you make a proper Samurai game. Not that SJW game Ubisoft is making.
    Link
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    Necrokiller said:
    Hellblade 2 has a lower peak player count than Redfall 😬
    That's still higher than it's total play length. A 5 hour campaign for a $50 game is downright scammy.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Hellblade 2 has a lower peak player count than Redfall 😬
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    LegacyGamerGuy said:
    Consoles were my main platform ever since Atari 2500. But now I think it's not worth it as PC especially with DLSS deliver far smoother performance. AW2 on console didn't even had ray tracing and ran below 30fps. Similar issues plagues DD2 on consoled.
    The cross gen era really made people think 60fps would be a new standard lol
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Welp, done with Hellblade 2. Thoroughly disappointed. Such a nothing burger after the unique experience of the first game.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    I have a PS5 but I am not satisfied with the experience. I am currently saving for a 4080 64 GB rig soon. Bit will wait for Pro if performance improves. This gen has been so bad I don't plan on buying consoles anymore for AAA gaming.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Consoles were my main platform ever since Atari 2500. But now I think it's not worth it as PC especially with DLSS deliver far smoother performance. AW2 on console didn't even had ray tracing and ran below 30fps. Similar issues plagues DD2 on consoled.
    Link
  • GloriousChicken GloriousChicken:
    It is indeed the worst generation by far.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Both PS and Xbox have been a flop this gen as they can barely maintain 30 fps in a lot of AAA games th.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    As per WCCF Tech review, Xbox Series X doesn't even maintain a consistent FPS and sometimes drops into the mid-20fps range. That's unacceptable, tbh.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    The Xbox Series X can drop into the mid-20fps range,
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Still, I wonder why the PC Gamer rated it worse than Gollum. 🤔
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    its more on me, than gamepass tbh
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    I am not spending as much time with it these days
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    I feel like with gamepass
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    LegacyGamerGuy said:
    Gradually transitioning from console gaming to PC as the games are not worth it. 6 hours of Hellblade 2 is just not worth the $50 price tag.
    Score 1 for game pass. I wouldn't pay full price for this at retail either.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Gradually transitioning from console gaming to PC as the games are not worth it. 6 hours of Hellblade 2 is just not worth the $50 price tag.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Just downloaded my first legit digital PC game on GoG at a discount of $8: Two Point Hospital. The same team behind Theme Hospital Two Point Studios now part of Sega. And I am having more fun than most recent AAA games except of course BG3.
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    gottdamnnn HB2 looks amazing. UE5 finally living up to its potential.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Still, I don't like either Sony or Microsoft as they are focusing more on corporate greed than delighting customers. PC gaming is best of gaming and worth every penny.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    PC Gamer score of 58/100 for Hellblade 2??? Is it really worse than Gollum that was 64/100? Microsoft games can't even come close to high scores of Sony exclusives apparently.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Chandoo said:
    Hellblade 2 83 OpenCritic, not bad at all. 2 points higher than the first game.
    first one is 84 Opencritic. Saga dropped to 82.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Saeen abhi tak to first one was better in every way. Atleast the first hour-ish
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    Hellblade 2 83 OpenCritic, not bad at all. 2 points higher than the first game.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    About the Microsoft (and Sony) debate, I feel both have become too greedy and losing their minds over corporate greed. Personally, I will never buy any console next gen and switch to PC gaming where democracy reins.
    Link
    XPremiuM XPremiuM: BTW, i started Ghost of Tsushima, and it got me hooked within the first couple of minutes. I...