Thoughts on AMD Ryzen? - Performance Review

[deltoid61]

Yep amd had failed many times

 

[jack]

You can find out how your CPU compares to AMD's upcoming Ryzen for free by using the same software they used in showing it off;


You can find out how your CPU compares to AMD's Ryzen for free | PCWorld

 

[max007]

Honestly I am excited for the new series but cant comment much to these benchmarks, so lets wait for the actual reviews.

 

[limpix007]

hype hype hype

 

[moeenm]

I would not form opinions until I see it in actual machine performing. AMD pulled this gimmiky presentation in the past with A10 4xxx and 5xxx APUs too despite they drastically failed on the delivery of processor-level performance. Moreover, this is perhaps the first time they contained TDP by about 30% margin than top of the shelf Skylakes. Lets hope they reveal something which is promising enough to make me turn back to building a whole AMD machine instead of compromising for TDP over performance. Price-to-Performance ratio is still there but can AMD contain the temperatures of its oven while cooking? Only one way to find out.

 

[nafu]

AMD RyZEN Performance Leak - Competing with Intel i7 6900K

French tech print magazine "Canard PC" is ready with early benchmarks of an AMD Ryzen 8-core processor. The scan of a page from its Ryzen performance review article got leaked to the web, revealing three key performance takeaways. In the first selection of tests, Canard PC put Ryzen through synthetic CPU-intensive tests that take advantage of as many CPU cores/threads as you can throw at them. These include the likes of H.264 and H.265 video encoding, WPrime, Blender, 3DSMax 2015, and Corona. Ryzen was found to be faster than the quad-core Core i7-6700K, and the six-core i7-6800K, but somewhere between the i7-6800K and the eight-core i7-6900K.

In the final segment, the reviewers tested the power-consumption of the processor. AMD rates the TDP of the Ryzen 8-core chip at 95W, which was desperately needed from a chip built on the 14 nm node. Here it was noted that Ryzen made a tremendous performance/Watt leap over the 32 nm FX-8370 "Vishera." It consumes 93W, just under the 96W consumed by the Core i7-6900K eight-core chip, and slightly more than the 85W consumed by the 22 nm Core i7-4790K "Devil's Canyon" quad-core chip. The 14 nm i7-6800K six-core chip draws 83W, and the quad-core 14 nm i7-6700K draws 62W.

AMD Ryzen Performance Review Leaked: Promising | techPowerUp

For other readings
First AMD Ryzen Review Leaked - Aggregate Performance 46% Faster Than FX-8370 with 93 Watt Power Consumption

 

[mac007]

atleast power draw will not increase even with real games but the performance.......cant say

 

[Behrox]

My only thought about this is that it's not coming here :'(