Remember that they have a lot of rural customers so they can't just allocate al lbands to 4G. At least, 5Mhz will be reserved for 3G, and a couple extra for 2G (depending on how the spectrum is allocated).
Also, for DC-HSPA, the spectrum needs to be contiguous. They've realized that with the sheer number of towers, instead of allocating bandwidth to 3G, allocate it to 4G and keep 3G to a throttled limit.
Aggregation can happen within each band (if the spectrum isn't contiguous - IIRC, it is, though) but it's better if it is contiguous - that way, there's "less hopping" required to achieve the same amount of bandwidth.
850Mhz is good for basic penetration. Not sure they can surrender that. What they COULD do is
5Mhz of 850 for 3G, and 5Mhz of 850 for 4G (as the base layer).
5Mhz of 2100Mhz for 3G
5Mhz of 900Mhz for 3G (for compatibility)
Spare some for 2G in 1800Mhz and 900Mhz
Toss the rest towards 4G.
Doesn't matter what we decide here; the networks have the stats on what phones are on their networks and what bands their phones connect to, and THEN they'll decide how to allocate spectrum and what to get rid of (remember, spectrum isn't free, requires a license payment after x number of years, and no operator wants to pay unnecessarily more, so I feel they're going to shed off some spectrum instead).
850Mhz was already riddled with issues (filter on network stations to stop interference) but it's good for penetration, albeit not too significantly different from 900Mhz, so... we can't theorize until we get an idea of which bands are being used and by how many devices, and what other bands those devices can support for impact analysis.