1)Which president ? Zardari ? the president have enough time to take notice on this one such incident to pressurize a common man? IF there was truth in this then the settlement would have realized a long time ago.
2) Yes i'm claiming Shahrukh did not fire the shots nor was he an accomplice. He had no control over the situation, however i'm not saying he is not at fault. I'm just saying he's not the person who shot Shahzeb as falsely claimed.
3) Shahrukh was 17 year old at the time of the incident, he turned 18 recently. The later bone density tests were influenced. Sikandar is an innocent man when it comes to politics , since this issue was politicize all institutions he once relied on (bribed,had relations with) turned on him. So this boy Shahrukh was told by Ashraf (his elder brother) on the day the sentence was handed to not let down and act as a winner. Although if you are raising this now , it seems more like they struck a deal early on , doesn't it ? if this was the case then i know their family personally, they were half dead since Shahrukh was sentenced and regularly begged Aurganzeb (Shahzeb Father) for mercy.
4) Yes, the story is like this:
Talpur servant apparently said to Shahzeb's sister when she returned from wedding , "kis wale ke saath shaadi hoi". Upon hearing this Shahzeb got infuriated (anyone will), went up to call his friends and his dad. They all came down and called Talpurs out to set things straight. This started a fight and Shahrukh not being related to them was coming back from Mcdonalds (sea-view corniche) which at that time was closed for renovation. He took this route to go towards KFC 26th street. He was getting a meal for his brother. Now at this point , when he took the turn in from seaview to the road leading to country club apartments to reach 26th street. He saw several people beating 2-3 guys on the main road. Seeing this he got off the car , and went to 'stop'. Upon which he was also beaten and it is at this point he exclaimed , 'i'm Shahrukh jatoi , son of Sikandar Jatoi' , repeatedly. He was then told by Aurganzeb (Shahzeb father) to go away and apparently Shahzeb's dad apologized. However Shahrukh said he won't let this go and called his cousins.
If you would read above (the article) and listen to the false testimonies , it is clearly mentioned that the fight was between Shahzeb and Talpurs, Shahrukh came in between or from somewhere. As for your last sentence, no body would adhere to the fact that Shahzeb deserved to die. Not even Shahrukh nor his family. Rage can lead to these circumstances and two wrongs don't make one right. Had it been Shahrukh who would've died during the initial beating , what then ? Since the family is now pardoned, what remains is to see how the ATC acts. Crime against state is what he was booked for , the following case of appeal will bring clear and more precise facts.