Asus GTX660 or Asus R9270x

Baghi

Baba Yaga
Mar 22, 2011
6,965
7
44
Karachi
so many choices don't know what to buy between NVidia and AMD war. I still love NVidia and no doubt 760 is great but out of my budget. but b/w 660gtx and 270x, 270x is superior and I don't have other choice. lets see. also if mantle is a future luxury then soon NVidia gonna come up with something to ruin this luxury, but ofcourse we don't wait for the future.
Don't be confused by some trolls here. Make your own call. Do you, as a PC gamer care how much revenue, market share a console generates? All you care is about the games released on PC, same way you shouldn't care what company developers chose to work with as long as you're enjoying the same gaming experience as the guy who bought said company's card.

i.e. the developers of Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider (2013), Hitman: Absolution, Far Cry 3 and some others worked with AMD but does it mean NVIDIA users can't play said games? Hell, FC3 even ran better at early stages on NVIDIA GPUs. Also, have a look at the graphs I posted above, the game (Metro: LL) is suppose to be optimized for NVIDIA graphics card, do you see any indication of AMD cards doing bad there?.

Good luck with your purchase, and don't forget to show us unboxing in the related section.

EDIT:
And for the record, NVIDIA already had their own API in the past named NVAPI, but it wasn't that successfull for God knows what reason.
 
Last edited:

Hussain Merchan

Proficient
Aug 16, 2011
682
3
24
Karachi
Don't be confused by some trolls here. Make your own call. Do you, as a PC gamer care how much revenue, market share a console generates? All you care is about the games released on PC, same way you shouldn't care what company developers chose to work with as long as you're enjoying the same gaming experience as the guy who bought said company's card.

i.e. the developers of Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider (2013), Hitman: Absolution, Far Cry 3 and some others worked with AMD but does it mean NVIDIA users can't play said games? Hell, FC3 even ran better at early stages on NVIDIA GPUs. Also, have a look at the graphs I posted above, the game (Metro: LL) is suppose to be optimized for NVIDIA graphics card, do you see any indication of AMD cards doing bad there?.

Good luck with your purchase, and don't forget to show us unboxing in the related section.

EDIT:
And for the record, NVIDIA already had their own API in the past named NVAPI, but it wasn't that successfull for God knows what reason.
totally agree, games don't rely on NVidia or AMD they work with both. it's more like rivalry and marketing and stealing money out of customers pocket. I played latest DX10 games on my old GTX260BE on medium settings. but I still prefer NVidia over AMD and I don't know why. maybe trust or maybe I'm used to of it.
 
May 1, 2013
164
0
21
Karachi
www.pakgamers.com
go for nvidia.....it will serve you..difference between these cards is if you want to do high performance gaming go for AMD and if you want to do wicked hardcore gaming go for NVIDIA....reliable and more efficient for high end gaming.....see any high end built of linus, newegg, tek syndicate why they use nvidia because it is better in all ways.....it is just like that intel vs amd
 

Baghi

Baba Yaga
Mar 22, 2011
6,965
7
44
Karachi
totally agree, games don't rely on NVidia or AMD they work with both. it's more like rivalry and marketing and stealing money out of customers pocket. I played latest DX10 games on my old GTX260BE on medium settings. but I still prefer NVidia over AMD and I don't know why. maybe trust or maybe I'm used to of it.
Follow your heart. :)

go for nvidia.....it will serve you..difference between these cards is if you want to do high performance gaming go for AMD and if you want to do wicked hardcore gaming go for NVIDIA....reliable and more efficient for high end gaming.....see any high end built of linus, newegg, tek syndicate why they use nvidia because it is better in all ways.....it is just like that intel vs amd
That's definitely not true and somewhat misleading. AMD is far behind from Intel in desktop CPU department, in the GPU department they're very competent. i.e. AMD's Hawaii die is 30% smaller than NVIDIA's GK110 (although consume more power) but performs just as well.
 
Last edited:

GloriousChicken

Glorious Chicken Lord of Team UG
Global Mod
Jul 30, 2013
2,652
173
69
Karachi
totally agree, games don't rely on NVidia or AMD they work with both. it's more like rivalry and marketing and stealing money out of customers pocket. I played latest DX10 games on my old GTX260BE on medium settings. but I still prefer NVidia over AMD and I don't know why. maybe trust or maybe I'm used to of it.
Follow your heart.

Also,
I vote for R9 270x.
AMD is not bad.
Nvidia is not good.
both are at same levels, and its you who call the shot meaning you'll determine who's pocket your moneys going to :p


More like a charity thing!!!!
 

HITMAN A4R

New member
Nov 13, 2013
8
0
1
bahawalpur
Well amd r9 270 is cheap price with same performance. just littebit change nvidia is not cheap but gtx 660 have physis and cuda :).if you want play game than go for amd r9 full and high :)
 

megaloden

Active member
Aug 25, 2011
292
0
21
Islamabad
Ye card milta ha pakistan ma? ASUS GTX660-DC2O-2GD5 GeForce GTX 660 2GB 192-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
We have disabled traderscore and are working on a fix. There was a bug with the plugin | Click for Discord
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • iampasha iampasha:
    SolitarySoldier said:
    Phil keeps talking about breaking barriers to gaming, making it accessible on all platforms yada yada, while killing competition and creativity at the same time. the fact that i actually believed him for a second lol
    guys the biggest yapper in the Industry right now. All he do is yap
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Phil should be held responsible for this shitfest too, just like Sarah, but it's highly likely that these decisions are coming from Satya. And this isn't even the end of it. More closures are coming.
    Link
  • SolitarySoldier SolitarySoldier:
    if we are moving towards more and more popular trash across platforms that make billions for companies, I'm happy with all the barriers and exclusivity because at least that brings some pressure to create good stuff.
    Link
  • SolitarySoldier SolitarySoldier:
    Phil keeps talking about breaking barriers to gaming, making it accessible on all platforms yada yada, while killing competition and creativity at the same time. the fact that i actually believed him for a second lol
    Link
  • SolitarySoldier SolitarySoldier:
    "These changes are not a reflection of the creativity and skill of the talented individuals at these teams or the risks they took to try new things" ... seems to me that's exactly what it is
    Link
  • SolitarySoldier SolitarySoldier:
    why make good games when u can just buy everyone and shut them down lol
    Link
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    I'm gonna say one last time, F*** Microsoft to infinity!
    Link
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    Microsoft deserves all the hate they can get. Seriously i can't explain how much i want to curse them out.
    Link
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    They could've sold the studios instead of closing them, but the nazi bastards just didn't want competition down the road.
    Link
  • Link
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    F*** Microsoft, and F*** their fanboys.
    Link
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    What's the f*** is wrong with them? I mean really? Have they completely lost it? F***ing retards.
    Link
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    So i just found out that f***ing s***bag Microsoft shut down Arkane Studio (makers of the brilliant Dishonored series) and Tango Gameworks (makers of the iconic The Evil Within series), among some other studios. I just want to say a giant F*** Y**! to Microsoft. THEY'VE F***ED UP BIG TIME this time.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    MS: Hold my trillion dollars
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Sony: We can f**k up a totally good situation.
    Link
  • Link
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    Started Dead Island 2, and i find it pretty lame. The story is shit. The characters are either cringe or bland (all 6 of them), The gameplay isn't fun. Even the goddamn zombies don't behave like proper zombies. They're all fast & intelligent unlike how zombies are supposed to be like. Any fan of "zombie" genre cannot possibly like this shitfest of a game. Dying Light 2 was million times better than this shit.
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    so Baldurs Gate 3 is pretty great!"
    Link
  • faraany3k faraany3k:
    So who here is waiting for Senua Hellblade 2. Prequel was a true mind fuck experience.
    Link
  • GloriousChicken GloriousChicken:
    Sad indeed
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    what a sad day
    Link
  • faraany3k faraany3k:
    Necrokiller said:
    MS one upping Sony in catching the biggest L in gaming
    tbh gaming industry as a whole is failing much like tech industry. They have buckled down too much to Corporate suites then relying on passionate and innovative people. A corporate only believes in financial growth and shareholders.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    MS one upping Sony in catching the biggest L in gaming
    Link
  • Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    oh
    Link
    iampasha iampasha: Phil keeps talking about breaking barriers to gaming, making it accessible on all platforms yada...