Microsoft admits Vista failure

Atif

Ancient Philosopher
Jan 18, 2007
4,222
6
43
41
From Mars
Actions speak louder than PR
WITH TWO OVERLAPPING events, Microsoft admitted what we have been saying all along, Vista, aka Windows Me Two (Me II), is a joke that no one wants. It did two unprecedented things this week that frankly stunned us.
Dell announced that it would be offering XP again on home PCs. The second that Vista came out, Microsoft makes it very hard for you to sell anything other than Me II. It can't do this on the business side because it would be laughed out the door, but for the walking sheep class, well, you take what you are shovelled.
This is classic abusive monopoly behavior, Microsoft wrote the modern book on it. It pulled all the major OEMs in by twisting their arms with the usual methods, and they again all fell into line. Never before has anyone backpedalled on this, to do so would earn you the wrath of Microsoft.
But Dell just did. This means that Me II sales are at least as bad as we think, the software and driver situation is just as miserable, and Dell had no choice but to buck the trend. If anyone thinks this is an act of atonement for foisting such a steaming pile on us, think again, it doesn't care about the consumer.
What happened is the OEMs revolted in the background and forced Microsoft's hand. This is a big neon sign above Me II saying 'FAILURE'. Blink blink blink. OK, Me II won't fail, Microsoft has OEMs whipped and threatened into a corner, it will sell, but you can almost hear the defectors marching toward Linux. This is a watershed.
The other equally monumental Me II failure? Gates in China launching a $3 version of bundled Me II. Why is this not altruism? Well, it goes back to piracy and how it helped enforce the MS monopoly. If you can easily pirate Windows, Linux has no price advantage, they both cost zero.
With Me II, Microsoft made it very hard to pirate. It is do-able, you can use the BIOS hack and probably a host of others, but the point is, it raised the bar enough so lots of people have to buy it. Want to bet that in a country with $100 average monthly salary, people aren't going to shell out $299 for Me II Broken Edition?
What did MS do? It dropped the price about 100x or so. I can't say this is unprecedented, when it made Office 2003 hard to pirate it had to backpedal with the student edition for about $150. This time though, things are much more desperate.
If you fit Microsoft's somewhat convoluted definition of poor, it still wants to lock you in, you might get rich enough to afford the full-priced stuff someday. It is at a dangerous crossroads, if its software bumps up the price of a computer by 100 per cent, people might look to alternatives.
That means no Me II DRM infection lock in, no mass migration to the newer Office obfuscated and patented file formats, and worse yet, people might utter the W word. Yes, you guessed it, 'why'. People might ask why it is sticking with the MS lock in, and at that point, it is in deep trouble.
So, it did the unthinkable, and dropped the price. I won't bother to hunt down all the exec quotes saying how people can't afford clean water would be overjoyed to sell kidneys to upgrade to the new version of Office, but they are out there. This was a sacred cow, and it is now hamburger backed up against the wall.
These two actions by Microsoft are proof of what I suggested three years ago. Microsoft has lost its ability to twist arms, and now it is going to die. It can't compete on level ground, so is left with backpedalling and discounts of almost 100 times.
What we are seeing is an unprecedented shift of power. It is also an unprecedented admission of failure. And the funniest part about the moves made? They are the wrong things to do. Microsoft is in deep trouble.
(Source)
 

A.Rafay

Seasoned
Jan 24, 2007
4,392
6
43
37
Karachi
lol.... thins article makes me laugh... however he is right.... personally I think Vista is released before time..... i won't say Vista a MEII coz Vista isn't a nightmare like Windows ME..... The price of Vista is way too high.... I don't expect it to come down.... XP isn't replaced in any Office yet.... it would take time.... but for home users like it or not but eventually u'll shift to vista
 

Atif

Ancient Philosopher
Jan 18, 2007
4,222
6
43
41
From Mars
Most of home users.as i observed around me,moved to Vista for its best looking visuals and nothing more than that but when they did not meet the desired results they again shifted to XP. I m aslo using XP for gaming though i have a powerful amchine but it would take some time for Vista to firm its foot.
 

Conscript

I <3 Bungie
Jan 20, 2007
10,442
6
43
Reach
Why would anyone need to shift to Vista when XP is one the most easy to use and efficient Operating Systems out there. Except your a gamer and want to use Dx10 changing to Vista is very expensive in hardware terms.
 

iNF3RN0

PG Founder
ADMIN
Jan 17, 2007
5,857
22
44
Karachi
www.pakgamers.com
I like vista..it's better then XP in terms of stability and contains much more eye candy as well! The main draw-back of vista is the hardware requirement

MS says that vista required minimum of 512MB RAM and a pentium-IV processor..well ask them that a user not only run the windows..he/she needs few other appz as well and vista is one big resource hog, (a average home user require at least 2GB of ram for vista and a core 2 duo processor)

For a gamer..vista is a nightmare..you need one hell of a high-end machine in order to handle both vista and the gaming and I am pretty much not everyone can afford a RS 90,000+ rig.

Thanks,
 

dejavu87

i pwn noobs
Jan 20, 2007
1,038
2
43
37
peshawar
www.aliirz.com
i totally agree with bilal bhai here...vista sure is pretty and stable unlike xp....the windows user rating experience something on my pc is 3.4...its a lil slower than xp...and xp is a cheeti in this regard on my system....but those visuals are just awe-inspiring :D
 

Atif

Ancient Philosopher
Jan 18, 2007
4,222
6
43
41
From Mars
Only the eye candy visuals are not enough for the Vista.I also agree with Inferno that it is more solid and stable in terms of application usage and other activities but as a gamer i don't like vista.I have observed that with 1 GB of ram u can't game on Vista.Vista uses 302 MB of ram when it starts and when u r doing nothing.This is horrible.
 

Crow

Seasoned
Jan 22, 2007
3,415
4
44
Why would anyone need to shift to Vista when XP is one the most easy to use and efficient Operating Systems out there.
Agree. I wouldn't...atleast for now. Maybe in a few years or so when XP becomes absolutely outdated.
 

Atif

Ancient Philosopher
Jan 18, 2007
4,222
6
43
41
From Mars
Guy Vista use this ram when u are not doing anything...XP recover itself as u start work but Vista put more load on ur ram and at the end u find urself in a world of shit.
 

A.Rafay

Seasoned
Jan 24, 2007
4,392
6
43
37
Karachi
vista won't replace XP for now..... I would take me at least 2 years to shift to vista.... we have to shift sooner or later..... Vista is nightmare in terms of performance..... you can decrease idle RAM usage by disabling unnecessary services.... however I would still suck
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
We have disabled traderscore and are working on a fix. There was a bug with the plugin | Click for Discord
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    iampasha iampasha: Alan wake 2 is yet to recover it's development costs. Due to no physical release and no steam...