The Official Formula 1 thread

YanZZah

XXXXXXXXXXX
Dec 17, 2008
2,382
0
42
hhmmm ... Button wrote on his Twitter account: "Don't expect too much from us this test as it'll be mostly systems checks", adding that McLaren-Honda faced a "long road" but had "massive potential".

bit interesting to see how Honda will prove to be much aggressor while re/teamed up with Maclaren.
 

StrikerX

Moderator
Moderator
Apr 6, 2009
6,624
26
54
Islamabad
First Pre-Season Test @ Jerez, Day 2

Times
01 Sebastian Vettel Ferrari 1:20.984 88 laps
02 Luiz Felipe Nasr Sauber 1:21.867 +0.883 89 laps
03 Valtteri Bottas Williams 1:22.319 +1.335 61 laps
04 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1:22.490 +1.506 91 laps
05 Max Verstappen Toro Rosso 1:24.167 +3.183 73 laps
06 Pastor Maldonado Lotus 1:25.802 +4.818 41 laps
07 Jenson Button McLaren 1:54.655 +33.671 6 laps
08 Daniil Kvyat Red Bull No times 18 laps
 

StrikerX

Moderator
Moderator
Apr 6, 2009
6,624
26
54
Islamabad
Alonso airlifted to hospital

Fernando Alonso's manager, Luis Garcia Abad, has assured the F1 community that the Spaniard is "ok" after he was airlifted to hospital following a crash on Sunday.

The double World Champion smashed into the wall between Turns 3 and 4 shortly before the midday lunch break on the final day of testing at the Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya.

He was immediately rushed to the circuit's medical centre by ambulance before being transferred to the Hospital General de Catalunya via helicopter for further checks.
More here...
 

StrikerX

Moderator
Moderator
Apr 6, 2009
6,624
26
54
Islamabad
Fernando Alonso out of Australian GP

McLaren's Fernando Alonso will miss the season-opening Australian Grand Prix on 15 March on medical advice.

Doctors have advised the 33-year-old Spaniard, who crashed in testing on 22 February, not to risk a second concussion by racing in Melbourne.

Alonso tweeted: "It will be tough not to be in Australia, but I understand the recommendations."
The two-time champion's place will be taken by 22-year-old Dane Kevin Magnussen, McLaren's reserve driver.
More here : BBC Sport - Fernando Alonso: McLaren driver to miss Australian Grand Prix
 

StrikerX

Moderator
Moderator
Apr 6, 2009
6,624
26
54
Islamabad
McLaren confirm Fernando Alonso DID suffer memory loss in Barcelona testing crash


Eric Boullier also confirmed that Alonso is disappointed not to be in the car for the Australian Grand Prix next weekend but his health is coming first

McLaren have confirmed that Fernando Alonso did suffer temporary memory loss following his crash at Barcelona testing.

Alonso was reported to have believed that he was in the year 1995 at the point he regained consciousness after being knocked out as his McLaren hit the track wall at the Circuit de Catalunya.

"I'm Fernando, I'm in karts and want to become Formula 1 driver," Alonso told doctors, according to Le Pais newspaper.
Full Article: McLaren confirm Fernando Alonso DID suffer memory loss in Barcelona testing crash - Mirror Online

[MENTION=4563]opethian[/MENTION] [MENTION=31237]sTraNg3r[/MENTION]
 

opethian

★★★
Supervisor
Jun 26, 2008
9,569
0
42
Rawalakot
www.facebook.com
Damn man, I read same thing 2 days back
It's a huge loss for the game n for his fans n for mclaren also.
Let's hope he gets well soon enough we have already lost a bright talent Robert Kubica in 2011, not Alonso this time.


Sent from my iPad Air 2 using Tapatalk
 

StrikerX

Moderator
Moderator
Apr 6, 2009
6,624
26
54
Islamabad
What a boring race, Mercedes's year again this. Ferrari seems to be the clear 2nd best in the paddock now, good on them and McLaren (one of em) at least finished the race :tv:

#BanMani

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 

aura

Proficient
Apr 5, 2009
538
0
21
KARACHI
Ferrari have the package..though it is going to be on how good they can generate the grip...
excellent drive by Kimi to get 4th from the back.....
 

sTraNg3r

0_o
Mar 6, 2011
2,084
0
41
Karachi
Wow. Great pace from Seb and Kimi. I hope they continue their progress, even though I think Mercedes threw this away themselves and handed the victory to Ferrari.
 

StrikerX

Moderator
Moderator
Apr 6, 2009
6,624
26
54
Islamabad
Wow. Great pace from Seb and Kimi. I hope they continue their progress, even though I think Mercedes threw this away themselves and handed the victory to Ferrari.
They somewhat did make a blunder by pitting under the safety car but what's noticeable is that Ferrari is very light on its tyres where as the Merc isn't. This should help Ferrari a lot on warmer tracks but might cause em an issue on colder tracks like the one in the next race. The ambient in Shanghai is around ~20C.

Anyways, I am still not convinced Ferrari have the raw pace to beat the Mercs, interesting few races ahead. Glad to see Ferrari back and Vettel winning, I am sure Michael would be proud :)
 

sTraNg3r

0_o
Mar 6, 2011
2,084
0
41
Karachi
They somewhat did make a blunder by pitting under the safety car but what's noticeable is that Ferrari is very light on its tyres where as the Merc isn't. This should help Ferrari a lot on warmer tracks but might cause em an issue on colder tracks like the one in the next race. The ambient in Shanghai is around ~20C.

Anyways, I am still not convinced Ferrari have the raw pace to beat the Mercs, interesting few races ahead. Glad to see Ferrari back and Vettel winning, I am sure Michael would be proud :)
Agreed. Ferrari couldn't have made up 30 to 40 seconds during the last two weeks. Merc screwed up their own strategy by pitting under the safety car.

Though I must say they were pretty hard on their tyres. Infact I always thought they were pretty hard on tyres, even last year, but their aero and power advantage never let their tyre troubles come to light.
 

StrikerX

Moderator
Moderator
Apr 6, 2009
6,624
26
54
Islamabad
Agreed. Ferrari couldn't have made up 30 to 40 seconds during the last two weeks. Merc screwed up their own strategy by pitting under the safety car.

Though I must say they were pretty hard on their tyres. Infact I always thought they were pretty hard on tyres, even last year, but their aero and power advantage never let their tyre troubles come to light.
If I recall correctly, 2013 Merc was very hard on its tyres as well. This seems to be an inherent trait in all Merc cars :crazy:
 

sTraNg3r

0_o
Mar 6, 2011
2,084
0
41
Karachi
If I recall correctly, 2013 Merc was very hard on its tyres as well. This seems to be an inherent trait in all Merc cars :crazy:
Correct. In-fact the 2013 Mercs were the worst on tyres. 4 or 5 laps into the stint and the usual radio message was "left-rear is gone!!" :crazy:
 

StrikerX

Moderator
Moderator
Apr 6, 2009
6,624
26
54
Islamabad
Jules Bianchi has succumbed to his injuries and passed away today. RIP Jules. [MENTION=4563]opethian[/MENTION] [MENTION=31237]sTraNg3r[/MENTION]
 
Last edited:

opethian

★★★
Supervisor
Jun 26, 2008
9,569
0
42
Rawalakot
www.facebook.com
he was fighting this painful war since october, i wonder how he even survived that crash
big loss and FIA should evolve some new rule of recovering cars on the tracks
should never happen again
 

sTraNg3r

0_o
Mar 6, 2011
2,084
0
41
Karachi
Jules Bianchi has succumbed to his injuries and passed away today. RIP Jules. @opethian @sTraNg3r

Sad news indeed. He was in line to replace Raikonnen imo. And he was good enough as well.


he was fighting this painful war since october, i wonder how he even survived that crash
big loss and FIA should evolve some new rule of recovering cars on the tracks
should never happen again
They did form a commission to investigate this issue with Ross Brawn as the head, which determined that firstly, Jules was carrying too much speed, and secondly - applied brakes and throttle simultaneously that resulted in over-ride of the safety mechanisms. It also resulted in the virtual safety car, and some other rule changes.

- - - Updated - - -

And this is the first F1 death since Senna, right?
 

opethian

★★★
Supervisor
Jun 26, 2008
9,569
0
42
Rawalakot
www.facebook.com
imagine any marshall getting hit by such a speedy car? we cant blame a dying guy for his actions in those split seconds
had there been no recovery vehicle Jules owuld have hit the wall barrier n other things n could have even hit the other car but his head injusry happened just becuase he hit the underside of that recovery
i wish in future they emply bigger cranes which recover cars from outside the track n there is as little movement as possible on the track. Nevertheless F1 is getting safer an safer this was an unfortunate incident as it was his time. Imagine car crashes happening at NASCAR
 

XxRebellionxX

Moderator
Moderator
Mar 10, 2010
6,132
0
42
Dublin
Official Formula 1 Thread

This thread will serve as PG's hub for all things F1. Now onto the season itself, Charlie was a pussy waiting around so much for Quali but the race was pretty awesome. Especially Ricciardo's overtakes on Raikkonen and Perez. The Ferrari's were nowhere to be found, I can't believe they were so much off the pace. I was rooting for a Daniel, or long shot Ocon or Stroll podium but oh well.

What do you guys think of McLaren securing Renault power? Should they stick with Honda? I'm personally conflicted as being my favorite team, I want them to perform better with Honda, as they are the defacto works team but Honda have proven to be so fucking incompetent. Spec 3.7 was +4BHP and some 2 tenths faster I think but they got annihilated at Monza. Singapore will suit them better, but Spec 4 is now being touted as a very major upgrade in both performance reliability terms. Still though, that doesn't fix the problem and McLaren really need to be a podium challenging team by next season.
[MENTION=11094]StrikerX[/MENTION], [MENTION=4177]NaNoW[/MENTION]. Any other F1 fans here?
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
Bugs, Issues, Feature Requests ▶ GO here ◀
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • CerebralTiger CerebralTiger:
    Not to mention, monirors capable of 4k/120Hz over hdmi require an hdmi 2.1 port, which is relatively rare atm
    Link
  • CerebralTiger CerebralTiger:
    It's a good deal for the price. You aren't getting a 4k/120Hz display for a bit more
    Link
  • CerebralTiger CerebralTiger:
    lmao @ mislead. Coming from a guy who has consulted me for display advice, that's incredibly hilarious :ROFLMAO: (receipts can be provided if needed)
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Besides, VRR works best at higher refresh rates. Not as "game changing" as people think below 60fps
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    chalo i guess i can put that on the backburner for now
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Not a viable solution to overclock monitors
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    GoldenHawk said:
    don't think it will be possible at most you will get 10hz more out of it and it could cause some stability issues if the ports on the monitor are not rated for higher refresh rate
    yeah even factory supported over locks dont go higher than 20-30hz
    • Like
    Reactions: GoldenHawk
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Downsample to shaid 4K bhi karle wo monitor.
    Link
  • GoldenHawk GoldenHawk:
    Chandoo said:
    well, my last 1080p monitor is able to run in 1440p without any issue. I have to imagine that one might overclock too (?)
    don't think it will be possible at most you will get 10hz more out of it and it could cause some stability issues if the ports on the monitor are not rated for higher refresh rate
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    well, my last 1080p monitor is able to run in 1440p without any issue. I have to imagine that one might overclock too (?)
    Link
  • GoldenHawk GoldenHawk:
    Even intel hd can push 144hz on Windows so there is no reason to bound yourself to a 60hz panel
    • Like
    Reactions: Necrokiller
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Chandoo said:
    its not specifically for the console, its just an replacement of the old monitor i have
    doesn't feel like an upgrade . 1440p high refresh is a significantly better investment like Goldie said
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Chandoo said:
    and once again i havent boguht anything yet :p
    fortunately. I'm sure some TV "experts" would've mislead otherwise
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    and once again i havent boguht anything yet :p
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    GoldenHawk said:
    Hardware is always getting more powerful even the 3060 ti is supposed to be able to do 2k 144hz
    benefits of iterative hardware, unlike being stuck to a specification for almost a decade
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    Necrokiller said:
    Why console game on a monitor to begin with when someone has a 4K TCL
    its not specifically for the console, its just an replacement of the old monitor i have
    Link
  • GoldenHawk GoldenHawk:
    Hardware is always getting more powerful even the 3060 ti is supposed to be able to do 2k 144hz
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Why console game on a monitor to begin with when someone has a 4K TCL
    Link
  • GoldenHawk GoldenHawk:
    Its just not just gaming everything feels smoother on a high refresh rate monitor even general windows usage and browsing the internet
    • Like
    Reactions: Necrokiller
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    but again i'll probably need a lot more new hardware to utilize anything > 60hz, including a new PC which I don't see happening for a long while
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    that does make sense in a way, i guess i can keep looking at some other deals
    Link
  • GoldenHawk GoldenHawk:
    Better to spend a bit more to get something that will be more future proof 60hz panel in 2020 isnt viable imo
    • Like
    Reactions: Necrokiller
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    GoldenHawk said:
    It's a native 60hz panel which is a dealbreaker at least choose one that in addition to 4k60 can go to 120hz on 2k so you can get high refresh rate gaming
    those naturally become a lot more expensive, just looking at it because of price point.
    Link
  • Link
  • GoldenHawk GoldenHawk:
    It's a native 60hz panel which is a dealbreaker at least choose one that in addition to 4k60 can go to 120hz on 2k so you can get high refresh rate gaming
    • Like
    Reactions: Necrokiller
    Link
    CerebralTiger CerebralTiger: Not to mention, monirors capable of 4k/120Hz over hdmi require an hdmi 2.1 port, which is...